摘要
人们关于我国现行宪法实施状况的总体评价,基于以法律是否完备为标准还是以权利救济为标准大致上存在两种截然相反的观点:一是认为宪法实施得好;一是认为宪法实施得不好。宪法实施之好坏其实不是以它有无完备的法律存在为标准,而是以宪法是否具有实效为标准。当公民基本权利受到国家机关立法侵害时,如果缺乏救济渠道,则会加剧社会矛盾或冲突,引发社会失序。因此,顺应世界宪政潮流,应当建构以权利救济为核心的宪法实施制度。
That people about the evaluation of the overall situation of current implementation of the constitution in our country,based on whether the law is complete as the standard or the right remedy as standard generally there are two opposite views: One is that the constitution implement was well; The other is that the constitution implement was not well. Whether Implementation of the constitution is good or not is not to have it without complete law exists as the standard,but on the basis of whether the constitution has the actual effect. When fundamental rights of citizens is infringed by any legislation,it will exacerbate social contradiction or conflict and lead to social disorder without the lack of relief channels,. Keep up with the trend of the world constitutionalism,therefore,should be constructed to right relief system as the core of implementation of the constitution.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期5-13,共9页
Legal Forum
基金
教育部人文社科基地重大项目<权利与政治研究>(12JJD820001)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
权利救济
宪法实施
法律实施
宪法解释
right remedy
implementation of the constitution
law enforcement
constitutional interpretation