再论“军傩”之不存——答任伟先生

On the Study of the Non-Existence of Soldiers Nuo:To Answer Mr.Ren Wei

有学者认为两宋不存在"静江军"这一行政单位,认同大多数学者所持的把"静江诸军傩"解读为"静江——诸——军傩"的观点,进而推导出"军傩"在历史上存在过。然而,笔者列举出目前学界已经搜罗出来的8则重要"军傩"文献,经过详细分析后发现,这些文献并不能证明"军傩"在历史上存在过。笔者又对"静江诸军"文献进行了考察,得出了与多数学者恰恰相反的结论——北宋确有"静江军",到南宋升级为静江府。在发现确凿的"军傩"文献前,说"军傩"历史上存在过,是值得商榷的。

Some scholars thinks that Jingjiangzhujunnuo should be read as Jingjiang-zhu-Junnuo because there was no Jingjiang Jun in the Song Dynasty.The fact is that JunNuo exsited in the history of the Northern Song Dynasty.Nevertheless,it could not be proved Jun Nuo did exist in history according to the detailed analysis of 8documents frequently used in the academic field which were listed by the author of this paper.Thus it can be concluded that there was Jingjiang Jun in the Northern Song Dynasty,which is in contrast with others’ and upgraded to Jingjiang Fu after analysis of the documents about Jingjiangjun.Therefore it’s questionable whether there is JunNuo in the history or not since there are no persuasive literatures.