期刊文献+

胃癌的ADC值与组织病理学因素的相关性研究 被引量:7

Study of correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value and histology features in gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估胃癌的ADC值与组织病理学因素的相关性。方法:回顾性分析68例胃癌患者的MRI资料,DWI b值取0和800s/mm^2。术后组织病理学因素包括肿瘤部位、TNM分期、组织学类型。分析肿瘤ADC值与各组织病理学因素之间的相关性。应用ROC曲线确定不同TNM分期和组织学类型的ADC鉴别界值。结果:随着胃癌TNM分期的增加,分化程度的减低,肿瘤的平均ADC值呈递减趋势。肿瘤的不同TNM分期、组织学类型和发生部位的ADC值差异具有统计学意义。诊断TNMⅠ期、Ⅱ期和高分化腺癌的ADC鉴别界值分别为0.917、0.906和1.034×10^(-3)mm^2/s,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.702、0.795和0.960。结论:ADC值作为一个无创性生物学指标有助于评估胃癌的组织病理学因素,包括TNM分期、组织学类型和发生部位。 Objective:To evaluate the correlation between histology features and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)value on diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)of gastric cancer.Methods:MRI materials of 68 cases with gastric cancer were analyzed retrospectively.The b values were 0,800s/mm2 on DWI.Post-surgical pathologic features included tumor site,TNM staging and histology pattern.Correlation between ADC values and histology features were analyzed.Receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)analysis was performed to find out the diagnostic cutoff of the ADC value,to distinguish different TNM staging and histology pattern of gastric cancer.Results:As the TNM stage increased,the mean ADC values of gastric cancer showed a trend of decreasing.There were significant differences in the mean ADC values among gastric cancer with different TNM stageing,histology pattern and tumor site.The diagnostic cutoff of the ADC values used to distinguish TNM stageⅠ,stageⅡ and well differentiated adenocarcinaoma was 0.917,0.906,and 1.034×10-3 mm2/s respectively,the area under the ROC curve was 0.702,0.795 and 0.960 respectively.Conclusion:The ADC values as a noninvasive biology parameter,might be helpful for evaluating the histological features of gastric cancer,including TNM staging histology pattern and tumor site.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2016年第3期240-244,共5页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 胃肿瘤 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 Gastric neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1赵娓娓,全志永,陈燕,王珂,任芳,赵青川,任静,宦怡.DWI及ADC值在胃癌淋巴结性质判断及化疗疗效评估中的作用[J].放射学实践,2015,30(5):566-570. 被引量:14
  • 2刘松,何健,管文贤,李强,周竹萍,俞海平,包善华,周正扬.含弥散加权成像磁共振与增强CT对胃癌术前T分期诊断准确率的比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2014,17(3):245-249. 被引量:14
  • 3唐磊,孙应实,李子禹,张晓鹏,曹崑,李晓婷,陕飞,李子然,季加孚.磁共振扩散加权成像表观扩散系数值与局部进展期胃癌新辅助化疗预后的关系[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(3):221-226. 被引量:16
  • 4Caivano R, Rabasco P, Lotumolo A, et al. Gastric cancer; the role of diffusion weighted imaging in the preoperative staging [J]. Cancer Invest,2014,32(5) : 184-190.
  • 5Washington K. 7th Edition of the AJCC Caneer Staging Manual: Stomaeh[J]. Ann Surg Oneol,2010,17(12) :3077-3079.
  • 6Miller FH, Hammond N, Siddiqi AJ, et al. Utility of diffusion- weighted MRI in distinguishing benign and malignant hepatie le- sions[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2010,32(1) :138-147.
  • 7Kobayashi S, Koga F, Yoshida S, et al. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer:potential utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a bio marker to predict clinical aggressiveness[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011.21 (10) :2178-2186.
  • 8Verma S, Rajesh A, Morales H, et al. Assessment of aggressive hess of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostateetomy[J]. AJR, 2011. 196(2) :374-381.
  • 9王蓓,吕成余,谢洪虎.351例胃癌术后患者的预后因素分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2012,19(7):743-748. 被引量:13
  • 10Adachi Y, Yasuda K, Inomata M, et al. Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type[J]. Cancer,2000,89 (7) :1418-1424.

二级参考文献74

共引文献63

同被引文献50

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部