期刊文献+

不同年龄段员工能力与薪酬预期匹配性研究 被引量:5

Research on the Compatibility Between the Ability Levels of Differently Aged Employees and Salary Expectations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在价值观时代,员工对薪酬内在价值的关注超越了对形式的关注。员工依据自身的能力而寻求与薪酬价值的对称性,成为员工薪酬价值体系中的重要内容。员工将通过薪酬水平、公平、成长性等感知自己的薪酬预期是否得到满足,成为影响员工薪酬满意度与工作行为的重要因素。然而在现实中,员工与组织在能力与薪酬匹配的价值视角存在差异,员工往往高估自身的能力与薪酬的预期,从而产生员工不满。研究以年龄为自变量,对员工能力与薪酬预期进行匹配性实证研究发现:20~30岁之间的员工,薪酬预期总体高于能力水平,但能力提升速度更快;31~45岁之间的员工,能力水平略微高于预期水平,二者基本匹配;45岁之后,薪酬预期明显高于能力水平并呈现背离的趋势。 In the age of emphasizing values,employees pay more attention to the intrinsic value of salaries than the form.Their search for the match between their competence and salary becomes one of the important components of employee compensation system.Whether employees' expected salary can be perceived as satisfied in light of compensation level,fairness,and growth rate become an important factors that affect employee pay satisfaction and job behavior.In reality,however,differences exist between the employee and the administration regarding the criteria whether ability has been greeted by compensation value.Employees tend to overestimate their own ability and salary expectations,resulting an employee dissatisfaction.Taking age as an independent variable,the compatibility between employees' ability and salary expectations is examined.The result reveals that for the group aged 20~30,salary expectation is overall higher than ability level,but ability level can be promoted fast;for the group aged 31~45,ability level is slightly higher than expected salary,and the two variables can basically match each other;after the age of 45,salary expectation is significantly higher than ability level and shows the tendency of deviation.
出处 《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期165-170,共6页 Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金项目重点项目(14AGL013) 兰州大学中央高校优秀研究生创新项目(15LZUJB WYJ047) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(15LZUJBWZD018 15LZUJBWZY101)
关键词 企业员工 年龄段 能力水平 薪酬预期 匹配性 exployee different age group ability level salary expectation compatibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Flanagan C. The Critical Incident Technique [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1954(4): 32-58.
  • 2David M. Testing for Competence Rather Than for "Intelligence" [J]. American Psychologist, 1973(28): 10-14.
  • 3徐燕,赵曙明.雇佣保障与员工创新行为的双路径关系模型研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(21):136-140. 被引量:4
  • 4叶凤云,汪传雷.知识型员工战略行为能力与信息行为能力多维分析[J].中国科技论坛,2013(1):139-144. 被引量:2
  • 5王重鸣,陈民科.管理胜任力特征分析:结构方程模型检验[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):513-516. 被引量:509
  • 6Schein H. Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organizational Needs[M]. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
  • 7Schein H. Career Anchors: Discovering Your Real Values[M]. San Diego: University Associates Inc, 1985.
  • 8刘泽双,闰付强,章丹.基于逻辑曲线的创新人才能力成长规律[G]//第六届中国发展进程中的管理科学与工程论文集.上海:上海财经大学出版社.2008.
  • 9Smith H L, Powell B. Great Expectations: Variations in Income Expectations Among College Seniors[J]. Sociology of Edu- cation, 1990(3): 194-207.
  • 10Iverson K. The Paradox of the Contented Female Manager: An Empirical Investigation of Gender Differences in Pay Ex- pectation in the Hospitality Industry[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2000(1): 33-51.

二级参考文献52

共引文献593

同被引文献87

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部