期刊文献+

不同任务类型对中国高低水平组EFL学习者写作过程的影响 被引量:8

The Influence of Task Type on Different Levels of Chinese EFL Learners' English Writing Process
原文传递
导出
摘要 对高低水平组共180名中国EFL学习者无材料、读写和读听写两类综合性作文的研究发现:1)读听写任务的双模态输入有利于高水平受试产出内容丰富、结构优化的文章;2)综合性写作有利于低水平受试组织内容、构思结构,但其使用相关策略的能力低,抄袭隐患大;3)不同水平组受试对任务内和任务间语言、内容、结构的难度表征不同,任务间综合性写作任务难度小于无材料作文,任务内语言难度最高;4)受试写作表征的解决问题、证明观点、对比和反驳能力差。 The present study investigated into 180 learners' writing processes across impromptu, reading-to-write, and reading-listening-writing tasks. The data indicated that: 1) integrative writing tasks can facilitate high-level subjects' organization optimization and content richness by using metacognitive and cognitive strategies; but low-level subjects had difficulty in using these strategies and have a tendency of plagiarism. 2) High-and low-level subjects had different difficulty representation in terms of language,content,and organization across the three writing tasks,and hold that language expression was the most difficult one. 3) All subjects' selecting,organizing,and monitoring on language review were restricted to word-and sentence-level,with few on content and organization. 4) More than half of high-and low-level subjects showed that they preferred integrative writing tasks.
作者 张新玲 周燕
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期87-95,158-159,共9页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
基金 上海市哲学社会科学教育科研规划项目"英语综合性读/听-写测试任务研究"(B11030) 上海大学外国语学院学术科研项目
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1修旭东.我国高校英语专业八级测试写作项目的理论效度检验研究[J].外语教学与研究,2008,40(6):447-453. 被引量:14
  • 2张新玲,曾用强,张洁.对大规模读写结合写作任务的效度验证[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2010,33(2):50-54. 被引量:27
  • 3张新玲,周燕.英语综合性听/读—写测试任务研究述评[J].外语测试与教学,2012(1):21-26. 被引量:7
  • 4Asenci6n, Y. Validation of Reading-to-write Assessment Tasks Performed by Second Language Learners [ D ]. Ph. D. dissertation. Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University, 2004.
  • 5Bachman, L.F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
  • 6Cohen, A.D. The coming of age of research on test-taking strategies [ J ]. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2006, 3 (4): 307-331.
  • 7Cumming, A., R. Kantor, K. Baba, U. Erdosy, K. Eouanzoui & M. James. Difference in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL [ J]. Assessing Writing, 2005, 10 ( 1 ) : 5-43.
  • 8Currie, P. Staying out of trouble: Apparent plagiarism and academic survival [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1998, 7 (1): 1-18.
  • 9Dovey, T. Facilitating writing from sources: A focus on both process and product [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2010, 9 (1): 45-60.
  • 10Feak, C. & B. Dobson. Building on the impromptu: A text-based academic writing assessment [ J ]. College ESL, 1996, 6 (1): 73-84.

二级参考文献52

共引文献44

同被引文献123

引证文献8

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部