期刊文献+

2004年—2013年WindSat海表面温度产品与浮标观测对比 被引量:12

Accuracy of Wind Sat sea surface temperature: Comparison of buoy data from 2004 to 2013
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用美国国家浮标数据中心NDBC和热带大气海洋计划TAO浮标的海表面温度数据,对Wind Sat 2004年—2013年近10年的海表面温度产品进行了验证。结果表明,在美国沿岸海域,Wind Sat反演得到的海表面温度的平均偏差为0.10°C,标准偏差为0.59°C;在近赤道太平洋海域,反演得到的海表面温度的平均偏差为–0.15°C,标准偏差为0.33°C。Wind Sat海表面温度在夏季相对浮标实测值有正偏差增大和负偏差缩小的趋势,在美国东海岸以及墨西哥湾区域部分站点反演得到的海表面温度的标准偏差较大,其标准偏差超过1°C。在5–10 m/s风速段,Wind Sat海表面温度反演效果比较理想,平均偏差和标准偏差相对恒定。当风速大于12 m/s时,Wind Sat海表面温度反演的不确定性明显增加。与AMSR-E月平均海表面温度产品对比发现,夏季,Wind Sat SST较AMSRE偏低;冬季,Wind Sat SST较AMSR-E偏高。 Sea Surface Temperature(SST) is one of the important parameters of hydrodynamic and oceanographic research. It has been widely utilized in the study of climate change, weather forecasting, numerical weather prediction(NWP), atmospheric and oceanographic applications, fisheries, and other sciences. This study compares SST derived from Wind Sat to those directly observed by NDBC/TAO buoy and SST provided by AMSR-E. In the collocation of Wind Sat and buoy data, an SST value with a rain rate larger than zero was rejected. Collocation adopted a ±30 min time constraint and 25 km maximum separation. A total of 82,247 Wind Sat-NDBC collocations and 366,693 WindSat-TAO collocations were acquired. Rsults show that Wind Sat SST has a mean bias of 0.10 °C and standard deviation of 0.59 °C in the coastal and offshore waters of the United States. In the tropical Pacific Ocean, Wind Sat SST has a mean bias of –0.15 °C and standard deviation of 0.33 °C. In addition, Wind Sat SST has an increasing warm bias or a decreasing cool bias in summer. The standard deviations of the satellite-derived SST are both relatively large in the US East Coast and in the Gulf of Mexico; the standard deviations of certain regions are higher than 1 °C. When the buoy wind speed ranges from 5 m/s to 10 m/s, the accuracy of Wind Sat SST is good, and the mean bias and standard deviation are relatively constant. When the buoy wind speed exceeds 12m/s, the uncertainty of Wind Sat SST increases. Global comparison with AMSR-E shows that Wind Sat monthly averaged SST is cooler than that of AMSR-Ein summer and warmer in winter. Even though it has operated beyond its designed life of seven years, Wind Sat SST continues to exhibit acceptable accuracy. Wind Sat retrieves SST better in tropical Pacific and worse in US coasts and in the Gulf of Mexico. The part of wind direction correction in retrieval algorithms needs to be improved to increase the accuracy of SST retrieval under conditions of high wind speed.
出处 《遥感学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期315-327,共13页 NATIONAL REMOTE SENSING BULLETIN
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:41205013)~~
关键词 海表面温度 WindSat NDBC浮标 TAO浮标 AMSR-E sea surface temperature Wind Sat NDBC buoy TAO buoy AMSR-E
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Castro S L, Wick G A and Emery W J. 2012. Evaluation of the relative performance of sea surface temperature measurements from differ- ent types of drifting and moored buoys using satellite-derived ref- erence products. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C2): C02029 [DOI: 10.1029/2011 JC007472].
  • 2Chelton D B, Esbensen S K, Schlax M G, Thum N, Freilich M H, Wentz F J, Gentemann C L, McPhaden M J and Schopf P S. 200i. Observations of coupling between surface wind stress and sea sur- face temperature in the eastern tropical Pacific. Journal of Climate, 14(7): 1479- 1498 [DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1479: OOCBSW>2.0.CO;2].
  • 3Chelton D B and Wentz F J. 2005. Global microwave satellite observa- tions of sea surface temperature for numerical weather prediction and climate research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological So- ciety, 86(8): 1097 - t 115 [DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-86-8-1097].
  • 4Curry J A, Bentamy A, Bourassa M A, Bourras D, Bradley E F, Brunke M, Castro S, Chou S H, Clayson C A, Emery W J, Eymard L, Fairall C W, Kubota M, Lin B, Petrie W, Reeder R A, Renfrew I A, Rossow W B, Schulz J, Smith S R, Webster P J, Wick G A and Zeng X. 2004. Seaflux. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 85(3): 409 - 424 [DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-85-3-409].
  • 5Dong S F, Gille S T, Sprintall J and Gentemann C. 2006. Validation of the advanced microwave scanning radiometer for the Earth Ob- serving System (AMSR-E) sea surface temperature in the South-ern Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978 - 2012), 111(C4): C04002 [DOI: 10.1029/2005JC002934].
  • 6Gaiser P W, St Germain K M, Twarog E M, Poe G A, Purdy W, Richardson D, Grossman W, Jones W L, Spencer D, Golba G, Cleveland J, Choy L, Bevilacqua R M and Chang P S. 2004. The WindSat spaceborne polarimetric microwave radiometer! sensor description and early orbit performance. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(11): 2347 - 2361 [DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.836867].
  • 7Gantemann C L, Wentz F J, Mears C A and Smith D K. 2004. In situ yalidation of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission microwave sea surface temperatures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978 - 2012), 109(CA): C04021 [DOI: 10.1029/2003JC002092].
  • 8姜景山.面向21世纪的中国微波遥感技术发展[J].中国工程科学,1999,1(2):78-82. 被引量:10
  • 9Kachi M, Naoki K, Hod M and Imaoka K. 2013. AM-SR2 validation results//2013 IEEE International (3eoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Melbourne, VIC: IEEE: 831 - 834 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6721287].
  • 10Kachi M, Shibata A, Murakami H and Imaoka K. 2014. Japanese GHRSST activities and the AMSR2 SST Validations//EGU Gen- eral Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vienna, Austria: 16: EGU2014-13862.

二级参考文献19

  • 1YIN Xiaobin1, LIU Yuguang1, WANG Zhenzhan2 & XIU Peng1 1. Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China,2. Center for Space and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China.A new algorithm for microwave radiometer remote sensing of sea surface salinity and temperature[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2006,49(11):1204-1211. 被引量:6
  • 2吴永森.遥感在水面薄层研究中应用的可行性分析及其验证[J].遥感技术与应用,1994,9(4):1-8. 被引量:3
  • 3YIN Xiaobin,LIU Yuguang,ZHANG Hande.Removing the impact of wind direction on remote sensing of sea surface salinity[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2006,51(11):1368-1373. 被引量:2
  • 4CURRY J A,BOURASSA M A,BOURRAS D,et al.SEAFLUX[J].Bull Amer Meteor Soc,2004,85(3):409-424.
  • 5CHELTON D B.WENTZ F J.Global microwave satellite observations of seasurface temperature for numerical weather prediction and climate research[J].Bull Amer Meteor Soc,2005,86(8):1097-1115.
  • 6WENTZ F J,MEISSNER T.AMSR ocean algorithm,version 2,RSS Tech.Rep.121599A[R]//Santa Rosa.Calif,Remote Sensing Systems,1999.
  • 7HANSEN D,HERMAN A.Temporal sampling requirements for surface drifting buoys in the tropical Pacific[J].J Atmos Oceanic Tech-nol,1989,6(4):599-607.
  • 8HANSEN D,POULAIN P M.Quality control and interpolations of WOCE-TOGA drifter data[J].J Atmos Oceanic Technol,1996,13 (4):900-909.
  • 9SYBRANDY A L,NIILER P P.WOCE/TOGA Lagrangian drifter construction manual[R]// SIO Ref.91/6,WOCE Rep.63,58 pp.,La Jolla,Calif,Scripps Inst.of Oceanogr,1992.
  • 10NIILER P P.The world ocean surface circulation[M]//SIEDLER G,CHURCH J,GOULD J.Ocean Circulation and Climate,volume 77 of International Geophysics Series.London:Academic Press,2001:193-204.

共引文献32

同被引文献116

引证文献12

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部