期刊文献+

动允直接知觉的共鸣原理 被引量:3

The Resonance Theory of Affordance Perception
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统认知理论认为我们只能间接知觉动允,而生态认知心理学则认为对动允的知觉是个体与环境信息直接共鸣的过程。生态认知心理学首先判定动允并不是存在于我们头脑中的认识,而是实际存在于个体-环境系统中的事实,对动允的直接知觉就是对动允的检测而非推测,是对动允信息的拾取而非对记忆内容的提取。这种直接知觉表现为身体的相关动作机制(动作神经元、肌肉组织等)与环境中动允信息的共鸣。进化与学习在共鸣形成与发展中具有重要作用。 Studies of the tool affordance effect for the last two decades have changed the understanding of perception. This article reviews theimportant findings and discusses different explanations of affordance perception by traditional cognitive psychology and ecological psychology. Weanalyze why traditional approach is inadequate to explain affordance perception and how resonance theory can offer a better interpretation from theecological perspective. As argued by Gibson, affordance is an emergent action possibility in the animal-environment system. It is a relationship between animal andenvironment about what actions an environment can afford and an animal can adapt. Empirical evidence shows that humans can immediately perceivethe affordances of a tool without subjective intention. Physiological observations demonstrate that neurons in premotor cortex and dorsal streamactivate remarkably as soon as the subjects see a tool in a reachable distance, even the subjects do not need to take any actions. Furthermore, humanare able to perceive affordances of more than two tools simultaneously, and also to perceive affordance for others. Traditionally, cognitive psychology proposes that the perceptual system first collects low-order sensory information to build an internaldescriptive representation of objects in the external world. And then, this information is used along with representations of the current needs andmemories of the past experience to deduce high-order information, such as affordance, and make judgments and decide upon a course of action.However, such claims have encountered difficulties in interpreting neural activities in terms of distinct perceptual, cognitive or motor systems, as themotor system immediately activates when seeing a manipulatable and reachable tool. To address the challenge, some traditional psychologists propose a motor simulation theory and suggest that when seeing a tool, the humanbrain also represents the actions and operations related to it, and we simulate these actions, estimate actions possible and suitable, and predict theresults of these actions. This is claimed as the way in which human perceive affordances in environment. The motor simulation theory has made good progress in robot design but it is not as nearly good in explaining affordance perception, since thetheory is inadequate to explain the findings (1) Affordance is not a real action but action possibilities about what animals can do and cannot do, andthe motor simulation theory largely disregards the distinction. (2) Experiments show that individuals can perceive affordance without simulation. (3)Motor simulation theory confines affordance perception within the tool perception, and does not take into account that affordance perception takesplace far beyond the domain and may extend to much broad relationship between human perception and environment. Building on an animal-environment system, ecological psychology explains the affordance perception differently. According to ecologicalpsychology: (1) Affordance is an emergent reality in an animal-environment system, not knowledge that existed in our head. (2) Affordances arewhat we perceive, and what we attend first in the environment, and, as many experiments that compare visually extinct patients with normal visionparticipants have demonstrated, the priority of affordance is perception. (3) During evolution and learning, individuals adapt themselves to differentaffordance information, and such adaptations bring changes in a body state, such as activation of motor neurons and muscle cells and transformation ofactions. (4) When individuals meet environmental affordance information, they pick up the inibrmation without the retrieval of memory, and the directperception of affordances appears to be an outcome of the resonance between our body's motor system and affordance information in the environment.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期336-342,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 上海交通大学文理交叉研究重点项目(13JCRZ03)的资助
关键词 动允 共鸣 直接知觉 生态心理学动作模拟 affordance, resonance, direct perception, ecological psychology, motor simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1Ambrosini, E., & Costantini M. (2013). Handles lost in non-reachable space. Experimental Brain Research, 229(2), 197-202.
  • 2Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2012). Grasping the pain: Motor resonance with dangerous affordances. Consciousness and Cognigon, 21(4), 1627-1639.
  • 3Anelli, F., Ranzini, M., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2013). Perceiving object dangerousness: An escape from pain? Experimental Brain Research, 228(4), 457-466.
  • 4Borghi, A. M., Bonfiglioli, C., Lugli, L., Ricciardelli, P., Rubichi, S., & Nieoletti, R. (2007). Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes. Neuroseienee Letters, 411(1), 17-21.
  • 5Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Natraj, N., & Wheaton, L. A. (2012). One hand, two objects: Emergence of affordance in contexts. Brain and Cognition, 80(1), 64- 73.
  • 6Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Pefformance, 36(2), 341-358.
  • 7Cardelliechio, P., Sinigaglia, C., & Costantini, M. (2013). Grasping affordances with the other's hand: A TMS study. Social Cognition and Affect Netwoscience, 8(4), 455-459.
  • 8Castiello, U., & Begliomini, C. (2008). The cortical control of visually guided grasping. Neumscientist, 14(2), 157-170.
  • 9Cole, W. G., Chan, G. L., Vereijken, B., & Adolph, K. E. (2013). Perceiving affordances for different motor skills. Experimental Brain Research, 22.5(3), 309-319.
  • 10Costantini, M., Ambresini, E., Tied, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committed, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research. 207(1-2), 95-103.

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部