期刊文献+

声触诊组织量化联合谷草转氨酶/血小板比值对慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者肝纤维化分期的价值 被引量:10

Virtual touch tissue quantification and aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用声触诊组织量化(VTQ)技术联合谷草转氨酶/血小板比值(APRI)对慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者肝纤维化分期的价值。方法将117例慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者按照穿刺活检病理结果,分为F1-F4组,均接受VTQ检查,测量并计算肝脏右叶s5-s8段的剪切波速度作为VTQ值,同时计算每例患者的APRI。随机选择34名健康志愿者作为对照组(F0组),同法测量、记录所有指标。分析VTQ、APRI与病理学分期的相关性,采用ROC曲线评价VTQ、APRI及二者线性结合(VTQ+APRI)分期F2以上级别肝纤维化的效能。结果各组VTQ值比较,除F1与F2组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)外,其余各组两两比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);APRI除F0与F1组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),其余各组间比较均差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。患者VTQ和APRI与肝纤维化病理学分期均呈正相关(r=0.814,0.677,P〈0.001)。评价≥F2级肝纤维化时,VTQ比APRI显示出更好的特异度(89.83%vs71.19%),阳性预测值(92.11%vs 82.47%),阳性似然比(7.48vs 3.02),ROC曲线下面积(AUC)亦较大(0.898vs0.845);而VTQ+APRI的AUC、敏感度、阴性预测值分别为0.913、82.61%、76.47%,均高于单独应用VTQ(0.898、76.09%、70.67%)。结论 VTQ与APRI均与慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者肝纤维化程度相关。对于F2以上级别肝纤维化,VTQ的诊断准确性高于APRI,而二者结合的诊断效能更高。 Objective To explore the value of virtual touch tissue quantification(VTQ)and aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index(APRI)for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB).Methods Totally 117 patients with CHB were divided into F1—F4groups according to the histological result,and underwent VTQ system exams,the value of shear wave velocity of VTQ of hepatic segments s5—s8were measured and the APRI were also acquired for each examinee.A total of 34 healthy volunteers were selected as control group(F0group),and underwent the same examinations as CHB patients.The correlation between VTQ,APRI and histological result was analyzed,and then the diagnostic performance of VTQ,APRI and(VTQ+APRI)for significant fibrosis(≥F2)was evaluated by ROC curve.Results There were statistically significant differences among these 5groups for VTQ(all P〈0.05)except for F1 and F2group(P〉0.05);as to APRI,except F0 and F1group,the rest of measurement showed significant difference(all P〈0.05);VTQ and APRI of patients demonstrated positive correlation with the histological stage(r=0.814,0.677,both P〈0.001).Compare to APRI,VTQ showed better specificity(89.83% vs 71.79%),positive predictive values(92.11% vs82.47%),positive likelihood ratio(7.48 vs 3.02)and more the area under the ROC curve(AUC,0.898 vs 0.845)for significant fibrosis(≥F2).The AUC,sensitivity,negative predictive values of VTQ+APRI was respectively 0.913,82.61% and 76.47%for significant fibrosis(≥F2),higher than those of VTQ(0.898,76.09%,70.67%).ConclusionVTQ and APRI correlated with the stage of hepatic fibrosis in CHB patients.For significant fibrosis(≥F2),VTQ showed better diagnostic accuracy than APRI,but a combination of both is the best method in diagnosis of hepatic fibrotic stage.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期398-402,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81471735) 深圳市科技计划项目(CXZZ20130322170220544 JCYJ20140411112047885)
关键词 超声检查 声触诊组织量化 谷草转氨酶/血小板比值 肝纤维化 Ultrasonography Virtual touch tissue quantification Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index Hepatic fibrosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1周伯平,崇雨田主编.病毒性肝炎.1版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2011:676-677.
  • 2Huwart L, $empoux C, Vieaut E, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastro enterology, 2008, 135(1) :32 40.
  • 3Poynard T, Halfon P, Castera L, et al. Variability of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves in the diagnostic evaluation of liver fibrosis markers: Impact of biopsy length and fragmentation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2007,25(6):733-739.
  • 4Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fi- brosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology, 2003, 38 (6): 1449-1457.
  • 5John QS, Jun SL. Linear combinations of multiple diagnostic markers. J AmStat Assoc, 1993,88:1350-1355.
  • 6董常峰,刘映霞,李汉英,黄婷,王耀,李玉丹,袁鲲.声速匹配与声触诊组织量化技术对比评价肝纤维化及早期肝硬化的研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2013,29(7):619-622. 被引量:20
  • 7Kaminuma C, Tsushima Y, Matsumoto N, et al. Reliable meas- urement procedure of virtual touch tissue quantification with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. J Ultrasound Med, 2011,30(6) :745-751.
  • 8胡巧,康利克,王小燕,吴潮清,陈海宁,黄小莉.声触诊组织定量分析技术分期诊断慢性肾病[J].中国医学影像技术,2014,30(3):453-456. 被引量:15
  • 9薛立云,闻捷先,黄备建,马姣姣,严丽霞,丁红,王文平.声触诊组织量化技术评估慢性肾病的影响因素及其应用价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2014,30(6):901-904. 被引量:5
  • 10Liu Y, Dong CF, Yang G, et al. Optimal linear combination of ARFI, transient elastography and APRI for the assessment of fi- brosis in chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int, 2014,35(3):816-825.

二级参考文献38

  • 1林腾,林蘅蘅,王金宏,许映斌.超声弹性成像诊断乳腺良恶性病灶应用分析[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2010,21(11):797-799. 被引量:18
  • 2全国eGFR课题协作组.MDRD方程在我国慢性肾脏病患者中的改良和评估[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2006,22(10):589-595. 被引量:706
  • 3沈建红,罗葆明,欧冰,杨海云.超声弹性成像与常规超声对乳腺病灶鉴别诊断价值的对比研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(4):540-542. 被引量:52
  • 4Fahey BJ, Nightingale KR, Nelson RC, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the abdomen demonstration of feasibility and utility. Uhrasound Med Biol,2005,31 : 1185-1198.
  • 5Palneri ML, Wang MH, Dahl JJ, et al. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol,2008 ,34 :546-558.
  • 6Nightingale KR, Bentley' R, Trahey G. Observations of tissue response to acoustic radiation force : Opportunities for imaging. Ultrasonic Imaging,2002,24 : 129-138.
  • 7周伯平,崇雨田主编.病毒性肝炎.1版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2011:676-677.
  • 8Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H, et al. Real time elastography-anadvanced method of ultrasound: First results in 108 patients withbreast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006,28 ( 3 ) : 335-340.
  • 9Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et al. Elastic moduli ofbreast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Ima-ging, 1998,20(4):260-274.
  • 10Konofagou EE. Quo vadis elasticity imaging? Ultrasonics,2004,42(1-9):331-336.

共引文献67

同被引文献48

引证文献10

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部