期刊文献+

小额诉讼与福利制度 被引量:24

Small Claims Litigation and Welfare System
原文传递
导出
摘要 小额诉讼制度作为改善社会成员生活状况的举措,发展于福利国家接近正义大背景之中,制度目的与诉讼规则都显现出福利化指向,其不但具有提高诉讼效率及合理配置司法资源的作用,还承载了社会政策功能。通过解决日常生活纠纷,小额诉讼程序能够提高公民生活品质,因而是社会大众需要、应得且能够平等使用的诉讼制度。基于社会正义的考量,宜对企业利用小额诉讼程序给予必要限制,建立民事与商事小额诉讼程序分置的制度。基于福利增进目标,我国宜设立以给付司法福利为任务的小额法院(法庭),由法官履行诉讼监护职能,体现社会政策照顾,通过诉讼费用的经济杠杆作用促进小额诉讼程序的推广适用,在程序上则体现大众化、简易化、快捷化特点。 As a measure to improve the living conditions of members of society, the Small Claims Procedure (SCP) developed in the background of access tO justice in the welfare states, both the procedural purpose and rules aim to the welfare, therefore SCP not only has promoting litigation efficiency function, but also carries the implementation of social policy function, as a procedure system oriented community service and resolving disputes in daily life, SCP can improve the citizens living quality. As a form of litigation welfare resource allocation, many countries has restricted the enterprise the eligibility of plaintiff in the SCP, China should also distinguish between civil and commercial SCP. With the parties as the center of procedure, the court bear the guardian role in providing social policy care for ordinary citi zens. To enhance the welfare in SCP, China should establish small courts as a judicial institute to pay the judicial welfare tasks, play its social policy function by guardian ad litem judges; promoting the application of Small Claims procedures through the adjustment of litigation costs; and achieve its popularity mi crofinance programs, simplified, fast--oriented goals.
作者 王福华
出处 《中外法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期116-138,共23页 Peking University Law Journal
关键词 小额诉讼 小额法院 诉讼福利 社会政策 一审终审 Small Claims Procedure Small ClaimsCourt Litigation welfare Social Policy the Final First Instance.
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1《欧盟小额诉讼程序法》第29条.
  • 2季秀平、朱金东.“小额诉讼程序研讨会综述”,载《人民法院报》2014年12月17日,第5版.
  • 3《上海法院开展小额诉讼审判工作实施细则(试行)》(2013年1月1日起试行)第23条.
  • 4韩国宪法法院1992年6月26日判例.
  • 5刘冬京.我国小额诉讼程序适用的案件类型之规范化探究[J].法学论坛,2014,29(3):104-111. 被引量:7
  • 6郑秉文.“福利模式”比较研究与福利改革实证分析——政治经济学的角度[J].学术界,2005(3):31-46. 被引量:31
  • 7《天津市高级人民法院关于适用小额程序审理民事案件相关问题的实施意见(试行)》(津高法(2012)270号).
  • 8德国小额程序的适用情况的数据来源:https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Rechtspflege/GerichtePer-sonal/Zivilgerichte. html.
  • 9日本小额程序的适用情况的数据来源:hup://www.courts.go.jp/search/:itsp0010.
  • 10《重庆市高级人民法院关于小额诉讼程序若干问题的解答》.

二级参考文献20

  • 1[丹麦]艾斯平-安德森.《福利资本主义的三个世界》[M].法律出版社,2003年版..
  • 2[日]中村英郎.《新民事诉讼法讲义》[M].法律出版社,2001年版.第209页.
  • 3Powell,M.and Barrientos,A.(April 5—6.2002).Theory and Method in the Welfare Modelling Business,Paper presented to COST A15 Conference,Oslo.
  • 4(加]R·米什拉.《资本主义社会的福利国家》[M].法律出版社,2003年.第40页.
  • 5Hagberg,samh(2000),A Brief Analysis of Esping—Anderson's”The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism”as a Measurement for the Commodification of Labor in Contemporary.Welfare States,INTS 4763,Paper#1.
  • 6Room,G.(1999),Commodification and Decommodification.A Developmental Critique.Institute for International Policy Analysis,Discussion Paper,University of Bath.28.331—51.
  • 7Powell,M.and Barrientos,A.(April.5—6.2002).Theory and Method in the Welfare Modelling Business,Paper presented to COST A15 Conference,Oslo.
  • 8Abrahamson,P.(1992)Welfare Pluralism in L.Hantrais et al(eds)Mixed Economy of Welfare.Cross—National Research Paper 6.Loughborough.Loughborough University.
  • 9Kosonen,P.(2001)Globalization and the Nordic welfare states in R.Sykes et al(eds)Globalization and European Welfare States.Basingstoke.Palgrave.153—72.
  • 10Allan, James P. (2002),Partisan Politics and Welfare State Outcomes:A Comparative Study of Eighteen Advanced Industrial democracies, 1979 - 1997, Keele European Parties Research Unit, (KEPRU), Working Paper 12, Keele University.

共引文献36

同被引文献162

引证文献24

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部