诉讼不举证的行政违法赔偿责任判断——对孙某诉镇政府行政赔偿案的评析

Causality Judgment of Compensation Cases for Administrative Illegality without Evidence Citation——Comment on Sun's Claim for Administrative Compensation from the Town's Government

违法行政行为造成当事人损害后果的,行政机关应当承担行政赔偿责任,这是行政赔偿诉讼的基本要义。法院以行政机关逾期未举证为由判决撤销行政行为,由此引发的行政赔偿诉讼中,判断行政机关是否应当对损害后果承担赔偿责任,与一般行政违法情形下的行政赔偿诉讼不同,需要具体分析辨别。人民法院以被告行政机关未在法定期限内提供证据、依据为由判决撤销行政行为,当事人依据该判决提起行政赔偿诉讼的,人民法院应审查认定行政行为是否实际存在违法情形,据此进行因果关系判断,得出当事人的赔偿主张是否成立的判决结论;人民法院对行政行为是否违法的审查强度,以"谁主张谁举证"原则,根据优势证据进行审查认定为宜。

When illegal administrative behavior causes the consequences of the damage to the party, the ad- ministrative organs should assume the liabilities for administrative compensation, which is the basic meaning of administrative compensation litigation. Different from common eases concerning administrative compensa- tions, careful scrutiny over detailed conditions is needed to judge whether administrative organs should be li- able on occasions where the court cancels the ease for lack of proper evidence in due time. When the people＇s court brings in a verdict of revoking administrative action on the grounds of the defendant administrative organ failing to provide evidence within the statutory time limit, as long as the litigant takes an administrative corn- pensation legal action based on that judgment, the people＇s court should investigate and identify whether ad- ministrative action actually breaks the law or not, and then makes causality judgment. In accordance with the conclusion, the court makes the decision of judgment whether the compensation the litigant asking for should be supported. The people＇s court＇s strength of examining the legality of administrative acts should be based on the principle of ＂People who advocate should present the prooF＇, and make a decision on dominant evidence.