期刊文献+

波动风险、剩余收益与股票的内在价值 被引量:2

Volatility Risk,Residual Income and Intrinsic Value of Stock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 剩余收益模型是在进一步追踪企业内在价值源泉的基础上建立起来的价值估值计量模型。本文拓展了传统的剩余收益模型,假设剩余收益遵循一阶回归过程,由上一期的剩余收益、经营活动净资产及波动风险决定,然后在此基础上数理推导风险调整下的价值估值模型并研究其性质。研究发现风险的加入改变了线性信息动态过程模型的结构系数,从而改变了价值系数。具体而言,波动风险对剩余收益有显著的负向影响(-0.0875),风险的增加会降低剩余收益的持续性及解释力度,符合理论假设;净经营资产对剩余收益的影响为负,与理论假设不符,说明中国上市公司实际采用偏向激进的会计政策;波动风险对股价及未确认商誉也有显著的负向影响。 The residual income model is built up on the basis of the source of intrinsic value, which is a more fundamen- tal assessment model. This research extends the traditional residual income model, assuming that the residual income fol- lows a first-order autoregressive process by the last period residual income, net operating assets and earnings volatility risk. Based on the mathematical derivation, the risk adjusted valuation model is built and its property is studied. It is found that the volatility risk changed the structure coefficient of the linear information dynamic model, which thereby changed the value coefficient. Specifically, the volatility risk of residual income has significant negative influence on the future residual income ( -0. 0875), the increase of risk will reduce residual income persistence and the explanatory pow- er, which is in accordance with the theoretical hypothesis; net operating assets has negative influence on the future resid- ual income, which is inconsistent with the theoretical hypothesis, indicating that Chinese listed companies use aggressive accounting policies in actual; volatility risk also has significant negative impact on stock price and unrecognized goodwill.
作者 冯凌茹
出处 《商业研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期76-84,共9页 Commercial Research
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"金融资源依赖与我国特大城市产业结构调整的关联机制研究" 项目编号:15BJL094
关键词 内在价值 估值模型 剩余收益 波动风险 intrinsic value valuation model residual income volatility risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Allayannis G, Weston J P. Earnings volatility, cashilow volatility, and rm value [ J ].2003.
  • 2Baginski S P, Wahlen J M. Residual income risk, in- trinsic values, and share prices[ J] .The Accounting Re- view, 2003,78(1) : 327-351.
  • 3Beaver W, Kettler P, Seholes M. The association be- tween market determined and accounting determined risk measures [ J ]. Accounting review, 1970: 654- 682.
  • 4Deehow P M, Hutton A P, Sloan R G. An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model[ J]. Journal of accounting and economies, 1999,26 (1) : 1 -34.
  • 5Dichev I D, Tang V W. Earnings volatility and earnings predictability[ J] .Journal of accounting and Economics, 2009,47(1) : 160-181.
  • 6Feltham G A, Ohlson J A. Valuation and clean surplus ac- counting for operating and financial activities* [ J ]. Con- temporary accounting research,1995,11(2) :689-731.
  • 7Giner B, Ifiiguez R. An empirical assessment of the Fehham-Ohlson models considering the sign of abnor- mal earnings [ J ]. Accounting and Business Research, 2006, 36(3) : 169-190.
  • 8Hausman J A. Specification tests in econometrics [ J ]. Eeonometriea: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1978 : 1251-1271.
  • 9Kothari S P. Capital markets research in accounting [J]. Journal of accounting and economics, 2001,31(1) : 105-231.
  • 10McCrae M, Nilsson H. The explanatory and predictive power of different specifications of the Ohlson ( 1995 ) valuation models [ J ], European Accounting Review, 2001, 10(2) : 315-341.

同被引文献41

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部