期刊文献+

转基因食品标识的争论及得失利弊的分析与研究 被引量:13

Studies on the Pros and Cons on Global GM Food Labeling Debate
原文传递
导出
摘要 全球第1例转基因作物于1996年在美国商业化。自其商业化以来,转基因产品在全球广泛应用多年。然而近些年在世界转基因产品消费大国——美国出现了对转基因食品是否进行强制标识的争论:一方面部分消费者和行业组织希望对转基因食品进行强制标识,以获得知情权和选择权;另一方面美国食品监管机构认为转基因食品与传统食品实质等同,不应基于生产方法而进行监管。目前美国政府对转基因食品采用自愿标识管理。本文结合其它国家和地区转基因标识管理的现状,以美国转基因食品标识争论为主线,分析争论的焦点和相关政策的变化,以期对我国转基因食品标识管理提供借鉴。 Since the first GM crop was commercialized in 1996, GM crop and GM food has been widely used in US for nearly 20 years. Recently, the mandatory labeling of GM food has become the predominant policy issue concerning biotechnology in US. The controversy over GM labeling is being debated at several different levels. Consumers 'choice and public opinion is the focus from pro-mandatory labeling activists, however, US regulatory authorities believe that GM food is substantial equivalent to traditional food. Therefore, the regulation against mandatory GM labeling has been adopted by regulatory agencies in past 20 plus years. Considering GM food labeling regulations in other countries/regions, the focus and related policy changes of this debate will be analyzed, which can be the reference to regulators in China.
作者 高炜 罗云波
出处 《中国食品学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期1-9,共9页 Journal of Chinese Institute Of Food Science and Technology
关键词 转基因食品 标识 法规 争论 GM food labeling regulatory policy debate
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1US Congress. H.R. 1599-Safe and accurate food labeling act of 2015[EB/OL]. [2015-12-04]. Official Website for U. S. Federal Legislative Iormation. https:llwww.cougress.govlbillll14th-coneslhouse-biW15991actis.
  • 2Clive James. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2014[M]. Philippines: The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, 2014: 16-19.
  • 3Graham Brookes, Peter Barfoot. Economic impact of GM crops: The global income and production effects 1996- 2012[J]. GM Crops & Food: Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain, 2014, 5(1): 65-75.
  • 4United States Department of Agriculture. World agricultural supply and demand estimates[EB/OL]. [2015-12-04]. USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocu- mentInfo.do?documentID= 1194.
  • 5United States Department of Agriculture. USDA soybean baseline, 2010-19 [EB/OL]. [2015-12-04]. USDA Econom- ic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gv/tpics/crps/sybeans-i-crps/market-utk/usda-sybean-baseine- 2010-19.aspx.
  • 6United States Department of Agriculture. U.S. corn trade[EB/OL]. [2015-12-04]. USDA Economic Research Service. http : Ilwww.ers.usda.govltopieslcrepslcornltrade.aspx.
  • 7United States Department of Agriculture. Corn Background[EB/OL]. [2015-12-04]. USDA Economic Research Service, http ://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/corn/background.aspx.
  • 8Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). The potential impacts of mandatory labeling for genetically engineered food in the United States[M]. Iowa: CAST, 2014: 54.
  • 9US Office of Science and Technology Policy. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; announcement of policy; notice for public comment[J]. Fed Regist, 1986, 51: 23303-23350. PMID: 11655807.
  • 10Food and Drug Administration. Statement of Policy: foods derived from new plant varieties[J]. Fed Regist, 1992, 57: 22, 991.

二级参考文献17

  • 1王锐,杨晓光.国际组织和世界各国对转基因食品的管理[J].卫生研究,2007,36(2):245-248. 被引量:15
  • 2边永民.欧盟转基因生物安全法评析[J].河北法学,2007,25(5):157-163. 被引量:19
  • 3毛新志.中美转基因食品政策的差异[J].科技管理研究,2007,27(6):54-55. 被引量:14
  • 4EC.Regulation No 258/97 of the European parliament and of the council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and no-vel food ingredients[S].Brussels:EC,1997.
  • 5ISAAA. Brief 46: Global status of commercialized biotechlGM crops in 2013[OL]. (2013)[2014-04-02). http://www. isaaa.orglresourceslpublicationslbriefs/46/default.asp.
  • 6Wohlers AE. Labeling of genetic modified food -closer to reality in the United States? [J]. Politics and the Life Science, 2013, 32(1): 74-84.
  • 7Gruere GP, Rao SR. A review of international labeling policies of genetically modified food to evaluate india's pro- posed rule[J]. AgBio Forum, 2007, 10(1): 51-64.
  • 8Marchant GE, Cardineau GA. The labeling debate in the United States[J]. GM Crops Food, 2013, 4(3): 126-134.
  • 9Marchant GE, Cardineau GA, Reddick TP. Thwarting consumer choice: the case against man -datory labeling for genetically modified foods[M]. Washington: AEI Press, 2010.
  • 10KPMG Consulting. Project ReportllEconomic impact study: potential costs of mandatory labeling of food products derived from biotechnology in Canada[R]. Amsterdam, Netherland: KPMG Consulting, 2000.

共引文献53

同被引文献122

引证文献13

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部