期刊文献+

猪小肠黏膜下层生物补片治疗盆腔器官脱垂的手术疗效分析 被引量:2

The clinical efficacy of porcine small intestinal submucosa for treating pelvic organ prolapse
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用猪小肠黏膜下层生物补片(SIS)治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的临床效果及并发症。方法回顾性分析2012年3月-2013年12月在北京大人民医院应用SIS行盆底重建手术的44例POP-Q≥Ⅱ期患者的临床资料。比较手术前后POP-Q各指示点位置及生活质量相关问卷(PFIQ-7、PFDI-20和PISQ-12)评分,分析术后患者的主客观复发率及下尿路症状。结果 44例患者随访时间为(2.4±0.7)年。术后患者主观复发率为6.8%(3/44),远低于客观复发率(36.4%,16/44)。术后未发生补片暴露。1例因尿潴留行补片缝线松解;1例阴道后壁补片植入部位感染,伴阴道疼痛,外用雌激素软膏后症状缓解;1例术后阴道前壁复发性脱垂Ⅲ期行Avaulta补片植入手术。患者PDFI-20评分由术前(66.25±28.35)分降为术后(17.03±21.00)分,PFIQ-7评分由术前(61.15±49.23)分降为术后(1.41±23.20)分,PISQ-12评分由术前(15.50±2.61)分降为术后(13.20±4.25)分。手术前后比较,除性生活质量评分外,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用SIS对POP患者行盆底重建手术后,患者生活质量明显提高,性生活质量无明显变化。患者主观满意度高,并发症少。基于较高的阴道前壁脱垂复发率,需要特别注意阴道前壁的修补,远期效果尚待随访观察。 Objective To study clinical effect of porcine small intestinal submucosa(SIS)in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse(POP).Methods From Mar.2012 to Dec.2013,44 patients with POP at more than Ⅱ of POP quantitation(POP-Q)staging system underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery with SIS in Peking University Peoples Hospital.The clinical data was analyzed retrospectively.The variable site of POP-Q staging system was compared between preoperative and postoperative status.Quality of life questionnaires of pelvic floor impact questionnaire(PFIQ-7),pelvic floor distress inventory short form(PFDI-20)and the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire(PISQ-12)were also studied.We analyzed the subjective and objective recurrence,focusing on the lower urinary tract symptoms.Results The average follow-up time was(2.4±0.7)years.The subjective recurrent rate was 3/44(6.8%),far lower than the objective recurrent rate(16/44,36.4%).No erosion was observed on those patients.One patient underwent a mesh release procedure because of urinary retention.One had vaginal pain because of posterior vaginal wall infection where the mesh and the symptom was relieved by estrogen cream.One patient underwent a second surgery with Avaulta transvaginal mesh due to recurrence of stage 3anterior vaginal wall prolapse and the dysuria.Preoperative and postoperative score of PFDI-20,PFIQ-7and PISQ-12 was from 66.25±28.35 preoperatively to 17.03±21.00,61.15±49.23 and 1.41±23.20,15.50±2.61 and 13.20±4.25,respectively.The statistics were significant difference except the PISQ-12.Conclusions Postoperatively,the quality of life of patients with SIS repair was significantly improved.The sexual quality of life had no improvement.Less complication was observed.Anterior repair deserves more attention because of the higher anterior recurrent rate.Long-term clinical effects on patients should be warranted to follow-up.
出处 《中国妇产科临床杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期99-102,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 科技部国家科技支撑计划课题(2014BAI05B02)
关键词 盆腔器官脱垂 猪小肠黏膜下层生物补片 生活质量 主观复发率 客观复发率 下尿路症状 pelvic organ prolapsed small intestinal submucosa quality of life objective recurrence subjective recurrence the lower urinary tract symptoms
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1高桂香,王鲁文,刘冬霞,鲍颖洁,刘志超,王丽艳,李彤.盆底重建术临床疗效及术后网片侵蚀暴露相关因素研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2015,24(11):844-847. 被引量:16
  • 2Alas AN, Anger JT. Management of apical pelvic organ pro- lapse. Cur Urol Rep, 2015, 16: 33.
  • 3马辛欣,孙秀丽,杨欣,王建六.Prolift和Avaulta补片前盆腔重建手术疗效分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2014,15(6):498-501. 被引量:4
  • 4Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22: 1445- 1457.
  • 5Geoffrion R, Murphy M, Robert M, et al. Vaginal paravagi- nal repair with porcine small intestine submueosa: midterm outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2011, 17:174 - 179.
  • 6Cosson M, Debodinance P, Boukerrou M, et. al. Ego A (2003) Mechanical properties of synthetic implants used in the repair of prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: which is the ideal material? Int Urogyneeol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2003, 14: 169-178.
  • 7Griffis K, Hale DS. Grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clinical Obstet Gyneeol, 2005, 48:713 - 723.
  • 8Trabuco EC, Klingele CJ, Gebhart Jt Xenograft use in re constructive pelvic surgery: a review of the literature. Int Urogyneeol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2007, 18:555 - 563.
  • 9张斯由,崔颖,申桂华,吕秋波,张毅.生物补片在女性前盆腔器官重建手术中作用的临床研究[J].中华老年医学杂志,2014,33(5):499-502. 被引量:4
  • 10宋利.补片在妇产科疾病中的临床应用及其生物相容性[J].中国组织工程研究,2012,16(12):2253-2256. 被引量:11

二级参考文献70

  • 1马庆良.应用聚丙烯补片行膀胱及尿道悬吊术的临床效果分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(3):193-194. 被引量:14
  • 2刘继娟,李坚,马乐.补片及其在盆腔器官膨出修补手术中的应用现状[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2007,3(4):230-233. 被引量:4
  • 3乐杰.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:89.
  • 4丰有吉.妇产科学[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:68-69.
  • 5李怀芳,王建军,李莉,陈信良,沈爱群,童晓文.网片全盆底重建术治疗子宫切除术后的阴道穹窿脱垂[J].现代妇产科进展,2007,16(7):548-549. 被引量:16
  • 6Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, et al. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004,191:1533-1538.
  • 7Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated cochrane summary review. Int Urogynecol J ,2011,22 : 1455-1457.
  • 8Trabuco EC, Klingele CJ, Gebhart JB. Xenograft use in reconstructive pelvic surgery: a review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct J, 2007,18:555-563.
  • 9Feldner PC Jr, Castro RA, Cipolotti LA, et al. Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2010,21 : 1057-1063.
  • 10Hodde J. Extracellular matrix as a bioactive material for soft tissue reconstruction. Aust N Z J Surg, 2006,76 : 1096-1100.

共引文献34

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部