期刊文献+

判断与决策中的投射偏差 被引量:1

The projection bias in judgment and decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 投射偏差是指个体常常会高估未来偏好与当前偏好的一致性,从而把当前偏好投射到未来的心理倾向性。本文从情感–认知加工、时间修正和心理模拟等视角对投射偏差的心理机制进行了解释,并概括出投射偏差的内源性(含内脏感觉、情绪状态和需要)和外源性(含事件相关信息、天气状况和选择情境)影响因素,还总结归纳出投射偏差的三种应对策略,最后指出了投射偏差在未来研究的方向。 Projection bias is one of the cognitive biases that individuals are prone to project their current preference to future preference prediction and to exaggerate the degree to which their future preference will resemble their current one. Many previous studies have observed and demonstrated this kind of phenomenon in different judgment and decision-making situations. Psychological mechanisms of the projection bias consist in affect-cognition processing, temporal correction, and mental simulation. The factors influencing the projection bias primarily consist of both endogenous factors(including visceral feeling, emotional state and need) and exogenous factors(including event-related information, weather condition and choosing situation). In addition, three kinds of coping strategies of projecting bias are summarized. In the end, this review points out several promising research topics that future researchers of the projection bias may probe into.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期422-430,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71571083)资助
关键词 投射偏差 情感–认知加工 共情鸿沟 时间修正 心理模拟 projection bias affect-cognition processing empathy gap temporal correction mental simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1李爱梅,鹿凡凡.幸福的体验效用与非理性决策行为的偏差机制[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(6):1059-1070. 被引量:11
  • 2刘聪慧,张耀华,俞国良.情感预测偏差的相关研究评述[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(8):1246-1255. 被引量:18
  • 3孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:148
  • 4Acland, D., & Levy, M. R. (2015). Naivet6, projection bias, and habit formation in gym attendance. Management Science, 61(1), 146-161.
  • 5Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 87-98.
  • 6Badger, G. J., Bickel, W. K., Giordano, L. A., Jacobs, E. A., Loewenstein, G., & Marseh, L. (2007). Altered states: The impact of immediate craving on the valuation of current and future opioids. Journal of Health Economics, 26(5), 865-876.
  • 7Baucells, M., & Sarin, R. K. (2010). Predicting utility under satiation and habit formation. Management Science, 56(2), 286-301.
  • 8Bauce|ls, M., & Sarin, R. K. (2013). Determinants of experienced utility: Laws and implications. Decision Analysis, I0(2), 135-151.
  • 9Baumgartner, H., Pieters, R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2008). Future- oriented emotions: Conceptualization and behavioral effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 685-696.
  • 10Bienenstock, S., & Ropaul, M. (2015). The price of freedom: Choosing between long- and short-term contracts in the presence of projection bias. Paper presented at the 7th seminar of the Future of Law and Economics, Paris, France.

二级参考文献96

  • 1孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:148
  • 2Sloman S A.The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,1996,119:3-22
  • 3Evans J S B T.Logical and human reasoning:An assessment of the deductive paradigm.Psychological Bulletin,2002,128:978-996
  • 4Evans J S B T.In two minds:dual-process account of reasoning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2003,7:454-459.
  • 5Stanovich K E,West R F.Individual differences in reasoning:Implications for the rationality debate.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,2000,23:645-726
  • 6Kahneman D,Frederick S.Representativeness revisited:Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.In:Gilovich T,Griffin D,Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.49-81
  • 7Sloman S A.Two systems of reasoning.In:Gilovich T,Griffin D,Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.379-396
  • 8Tversky A,Kahneman D.External versus intuitive reasoning:The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review,1983,90:293-315
  • 9Evans J S B T.The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning:extension and evaluation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2006,13:378-395
  • 10Sherman J W.On building a better process model:It is not only how many,but which ones and by which means? Psychological Inquiry,2006,17:173-184

共引文献174

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部