期刊文献+

Comparison and combination of EAKF and SIR-PF in the Bayesian filter framework 被引量:3

Comparison and combination of EAKF and SIR-PF in the Bayesian filter framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Bayesian estimation theory provides a general approach for the state estimate of linear or nonlinear and Gaussian or non-Gaussian systems. In this study, we first explore two Bayesian-based methods: ensemble adjustment Kalman filter(EAKF) and sequential importance resampling particle filter(SIR-PF), using a well-known nonlinear and non-Gaussian model(Lorenz '63 model). The EAKF, which is a deterministic scheme of the ensemble Kalman filter(En KF), performs better than the classical(stochastic) En KF in a general framework. Comparison between the SIR-PF and the EAKF reveals that the former outperforms the latter if ensemble size is so large that can avoid the filter degeneracy, and vice versa. The impact of the probability density functions and effective ensemble sizes on assimilation performances are also explored. On the basis of comparisons between the SIR-PF and the EAKF, a mixture filter, called ensemble adjustment Kalman particle filter(EAKPF), is proposed to combine their both merits. Similar to the ensemble Kalman particle filter, which combines the stochastic En KF and SIR-PF analysis schemes with a tuning parameter, the new mixture filter essentially provides a continuous interpolation between the EAKF and SIR-PF. The same Lorenz '63 model is used as a testbed, showing that the EAKPF is able to overcome filter degeneracy while maintaining the non-Gaussian nature, and performs better than the EAKF given limited ensemble size. Bayesian estimation theory provides a general approach for the state estimate of linear or nonlinear and Gaussian or non-Gaussian systems. In this study, we first explore two Bayesian-based methods: ensemble adjustment Kalman filter(EAKF) and sequential importance resampling particle filter(SIR-PF), using a well-known nonlinear and non-Gaussian model(Lorenz '63 model). The EAKF, which is a deterministic scheme of the ensemble Kalman filter(En KF), performs better than the classical(stochastic) En KF in a general framework. Comparison between the SIR-PF and the EAKF reveals that the former outperforms the latter if ensemble size is so large that can avoid the filter degeneracy, and vice versa. The impact of the probability density functions and effective ensemble sizes on assimilation performances are also explored. On the basis of comparisons between the SIR-PF and the EAKF, a mixture filter, called ensemble adjustment Kalman particle filter(EAKPF), is proposed to combine their both merits. Similar to the ensemble Kalman particle filter, which combines the stochastic En KF and SIR-PF analysis schemes with a tuning parameter, the new mixture filter essentially provides a continuous interpolation between the EAKF and SIR-PF. The same Lorenz '63 model is used as a testbed, showing that the EAKPF is able to overcome filter degeneracy while maintaining the non-Gaussian nature, and performs better than the EAKF given limited ensemble size.
出处 《Acta Oceanologica Sinica》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第3期69-78,共10页 海洋学报(英文版)
基金 The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 41276029 and 41321004 the Project of State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics,Second Institute of Oceanography under contract No.SOEDZZ1404 the National Basic Research Program(973 Program)of China under contract No.2013CB430302
关键词 data assimilation ensemble adjustment Kalman filter particle filter Bayesian estimation ensemble adjustment Kalman particle filter data assimilation ensemble adjustment Kalman filter particle filter Bayesian estimation ensemble adjustment Kalman particle filter
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Ambadan, J. T., and Y. M. Tang, 2011: Sigma-point particle fil- ter for parameter estimation in a multiplicative noise envi- ronment. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 3, M12005, doi: 10.1029/2011MS000065.
  • 2Anderson, J. L., 2001: An ensemble adjustment kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2884-2903.
  • 3Courtier, E, and Coauthors, 1998: The ECMWF implementation of three-dimensional variational assimilation (3D-Var). I: For- mulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1783-1807.
  • 4Deng, Z., Y. Tang, D. Chen, and G. Wang 2012: A hybrid ensem- ble generation method for EnKF for Argo data assimilation. Atmos-Ocean, 50, 129-145.
  • 5Evensen, G., 1994: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to fore-cast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 99(C5), 10 143-10 162.
  • 6Evensen, G., 1997: Advanceddata assimilation for strongly non- linear dynamics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 1342-1354.
  • 7Evensen, G., 2003: The Ensemble Kalman Filter: Theoretical for- mulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dynamics, 53, 343-367.
  • 8Furrer, R., and T. Bengtsson, 2007: Estimation of high-dimensional prior and posterior covariance matrices in Kalman filter vari- ants. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 98, 227-255.
  • 9Houtekamer, E L., and H. L. Mitchell, 2001: A sequential ensem- ble kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 123-137.
  • 10Hunt, B. R., E. J. Kostelich, and I. Szunyogh, 2007: Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: A local ensemble transform kalman filter. Physica D, 230, 112-126.

共引文献1

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部