期刊文献+

间断并延缓撤离持续气道正压通气对早产儿呼吸支持效果的影响 被引量:6

The effect of intermittent and delayed withdrawal of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on respiratory support of preterm infants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨间断并延缓撤离鼻塞持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)对极低出生体重的早产儿接受氧疗时间、住院时间、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)发生率的影响。方法选取胎龄27^(+0)~31^(+6)周、出生体重<1 500 g、中-重度呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的早产儿92例,随机分为间断并延缓撤离组(n=47)和直接撤离组(n=45),做2年期前瞻性研究。两组均先接受气管插管机械通气联合肺表面活性物质(PS)治疗,撤离呼吸机后接受nCPAP,待病情允许分别实施间断并延缓撤离和直接撤离nCPAP。比较两组撤离nCPAP失败率、再插管率、BPD发生率,以及接受氧疗时间和住院时间。结果间断并延缓撤离组较直接撤离组撤离n CPAP失败率降低(8.5%vs.24.4%;χ~2=4.277,P<0.05),再插管率降低(4.3%vs.17.8%;χ~2=4.339,P<0.05),接受氧疗时间缩短[(19±3)d vs.(21±3)d;t=3.356,P<0.05],住院时间缩短[(42±3)d vs.(44±3)d;t=2.998,P<0.05],差异均有统计学意义;BPD发生率降低(8.5%vs.17.8%;χ~2=1.741,P>0.05),但差异无统计学意义。结论对接受nCPAP治疗的极低出生体重的早产儿采用间断并延缓撤离nCPAP失败率低,能减少再插管机会,能缩短氧疗时间及住院时间。 Objective To explore the effect of intermittent and delayed withdrawal of nasal continuous positive airway pressure(nCPAP) on very low birth weight infants. Methods A total of 92 preterm infants whose gestational age between 27^(+ 0)~31^(+ 6) weeks and whose birth weight less than 1 500 g with moderate or severe respiratory distress syndrome were included. Ninety-two infants were randomized to either intermittent and delayed group(n=47) or direct-off group(n=45). All infants received mechanical ventilation and pulmonary surfactant prior to n CPAP. Either intermittent and delayed withdrawal or direct-off withdrawal was conducted when infants became stable. Withdrawals were regarded as success if infants had been withdrawn n CPAP and stable for 7 d. We regarded two withdrawals as withdrawal failure, and assessed the occurrence of reintubation, duration on oxygen, length in hospital stay and incidence of BPD by using the t test and the chi-square test. Results Primary outcomes showed that intermittent and delayed group had significantly less failure and significantly less reintubation comparing with the direct-off group(8.5% vs. 24.4%, χ2=4.277, P0.05; 4.3% vs. 17.8%,χ~2=4.339,P0.05). Secondary outcomes showed that intermittent and delayed group had a significantly shorter oxygen duration[(19±3)d vs.(21±3)d; t = 3.356, P0.05] and a significantly shorter length in hospital stay comparing with directoff group[(42±3)d vs.(44±3)d; t = 2.998, P0.05]. Intermittent and delayed group had a insignificantly less incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD) comparing with the direct-off group(8.5% vs. 17.8%; χ~2=1.741, P0.05). Conclusion The intermittent and delayed withdrawal may be associated with less failure of nCPAP, less reintubation, shorter duration on oxygen and shorter length in hospital stay for very low birth weight infants on nCPAP.
作者 陈宇辉 赵磊
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2016年第2期137-140,共4页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 婴儿 早产 持续气道正压通气 撤离 Infant Preterm Continuous positive airway pressure Withdrawal
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358 : 700-708.
  • 2Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants [J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362 : 1970-1979.
  • 3Gupta S, Sinha SK, Donn SM. Ventilatory management and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants [J]. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2009,14:367-373.
  • 4Kugelman A, Feferkom I, Riskin A, et al. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study [ J ]. J Pediatr, 2007,150:521-526.
  • 5McCallion N, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in the neonate [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, (3) : CD003666.
  • 6Singh J, Sinha SK, Clarke P, et al. Mechnieal ventilation of very low birth weight infants : is volume or pressure a better target variable? [ J ]. J Pediatr, 2006,149 : 308-313.
  • 7HiFi study Group.High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants [J]. N Engl J Med, 320: 88-93,1989.
  • 8Keszler M, Modanlou HD, Brudno DS, et al Muhicentrer controlled clinical trial of high-frequency jet ventilation in preterm infants with uncomplicated respiratory distress syndrome [ J ]. Pediatrics, 1997,100:593-599.
  • 9Courtney SE, Durand D J, Asselin JM, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347 : 643-652.
  • 10Johnson AH, Peacock JL, Greenough A, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2002,347 : 633-642.

共引文献20

同被引文献51

  • 1邵肖梅,叶鸿瑶,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:807-808.
  • 2喻文亮,钱素云,陶建平.小儿机械通气学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2012:156-161.
  • 3Moretti C,Gizzi C,Montecchia F,et al.Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation of the newborn:technical issues and clinical results[J].Neonatology,2016,109(4):359-365.
  • 4Friedman C A,Menchaca R C,Baker M C,et al.Bubble nasal CPAP,early surfactant treatment,and rapid extubation are associated with decreased incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very-low-birth-weight newborns:efficacy and safety considerations[J].Respir Care,2013,58(7):1134-1142.
  • 5Khan A M,Shabarek F M,Zwischenberger J B,et al.Utility of daily head ultrasonography for infants on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J].J Pediatr Surg,1998,33(8):1229-1232.
  • 6Sweet D G,Carnielli V,Greisen G,et al.European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants-2010 update[J].Neonatology,2010,97(4):402-417.
  • 7陈宇辉,张耀东,康文清,等.不同持续气道正压通气撤离方式对极低出生体重早产儿的影响[C].中国医师协会第三次全国新生儿科医师大会论文集,2013:229-229.
  • 8刘敬.足月新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的诊断与治疗[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2013,28(14):1117-1120. 被引量:26
  • 9杨庆南.经鼻持续气道内正压在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气撤离后应用的临床探讨[J].中国医师进修杂志,2013,36(30):41-43. 被引量:3
  • 10李秋平,刘敬,孔祥永,封志纯.欧洲早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征管理指南(2013)介绍及解读[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2013,28(24):1915-1920. 被引量:30

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部