心理学视角下的权威合法性研究现状及展望被引量：4

Legitimacy of Authority:Conceptualization,Antecedents and Prospects

下载PDF

导出

摘要权威合法性是指人们对权威及其决策恰当性、合理性以及公正性的感知及信念。其测量分为单维测量与多维(二维和三维)测量。权威合法性的非工具性影响因素包括程序公正、结果依赖性;工具性影响因素包括结果适宜性、权威效能。未来研究可分析程序公正影响权威合法性的心理机制,加强对道德因素的研究,注重对认知合法性的研究。 Legitimacy of authority is the perception or assumption that the decisions of authority are proper,appropriate and just.The measurements of legitimacy of authority include one-dimensional models and multi-dimensional（two-dimensional and threedimensional） measurement models.The non-instrumental factors of legitimacy of authority include procedural justice and outcome dependence,while instrumental factors include outcome favorability and effectiveness of authority.Future studies may explore the underlying mechanisms of the relationship between procedural justice and legitimacy,substantiate the effect of moral factors,and analyze the effect of cognitive legitimacy as well.

作者梁娟马红宇吴柳

机构地区华中师范大学心理学院青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室

出处《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期168-173,共6页 Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基金国家自然科学基金重大研究计划重点支持项目"非常规突发事件下社会群体心理与行为变化规律和机制"(91324201) 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目"家文化构建与民营企业的健康可持续发展研究"(CCNU14Z02015)

关键词权威合法性影响因素程序公正认知合法性 legitimacy of authority legitimacy authority voluntary to obey procedural justice

分类号 B842 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1Tyler,Tom R.“Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.”Annu.Rev.Psychol.57,no.1(2006):375-400.
2Gibson,James L.“Overcoming Apartheid:Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation?.”Politikon 31,no.2(2004):129-155.
3Sunshine,Jason,and Tom R.Tyler.“The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.”Law&Society Review 37,no.3(2003):513-548.
4Tyler,Tom R.Why People Obey the Law:With a New Afterword.Princeton University Press,2006b.
5Tyler,Tom R.,and Jonathan Jackson.“Popular Legitimacy and The Exercise of Legal Authority:Motivating Compliance,Cooperation,and Engagement.”Psychology,Public Policy,and Law 20,no.1(2014):78-95.
6Tankebe,Justice,Michael D.Reisig,and Xia Wang.“A Multidimensional Model of Police Legitimacy:A Cross-Cultural Assessment.”2015,In Press.
7Suchman,Mark C.“Managing Legitimacy:Strategic and Institutional Approaches.”Academy of Management Review 20,no.3(1995):571-610.
8Trevio,Linda Klebe,et al.“Legitimating the Legitimate:A Grounded Theory Study of Legitimacy Work among Ethics and Compliance Officers.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 123,no.2(2014):186-205.
9Bradford,Ben.“Policing and Social Identity:Procedural Justice,Inclusion and Cooperation between Police and Public.”Policing and Society24,no.1(2014):22-43.
10Tost,Leigh Plunkett.“An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments.”Academy of Management Review 36,no.4(2011):686-710.

二级参考文献59

1张德胜,金耀基,陈海文,陈健民,杨中芳,赵志裕,伊莎白.论中庸理性:工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外[J].社会学研究,2001(2):33-48. 被引量：196
2翟学伟.人情、面子与权力的再生产——情理社会中的社会交换方式[J].社会学研究,2004(5):48-57. 被引量：511
3段锦云,钟建安.组织中的进谏行为[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):69-71. 被引量：99
4郭冠清.文化因素对企业经营绩效影响的研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(10):91-97. 被引量：24
5陈之昭.面子心理的理论分析与实际研究,收录于中国社会心理学评论(第二辑),翟学伟.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.
6李敏龙,杨国枢.(2008).忍的心理与行为.见杨国枢,黄光国,杨中芳(编),华人本土心理学(下)(pp.579-608).重庆:重庆大学出版社.
7黄光国.(2006).人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏.见杨国枢(编),中国人的心理(PP.226-248).南京:江苏教育出版社.
8黄光国.(2008).华人社会中的脸面观.见杨国枢,黄光国,杨中芳(编),华人本土心理学(pp.355-394).重庆:重庆大学出版社.
9黄丽莉.(2008).人际和谐与人际冲突.见杨国枢,黄光国,杨中芳(编),华华人本土心理学(PP.505-548).重庆:重庆大学出版社.
10Botero, I. C., & van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 84-104.