期刊文献+

图形-背景关系的可逆性与转喻的认知机制 被引量:2

The Reversibility of Figure-Ground Theory and the Cognitive Mechanism of Metonymy
原文传递
导出
摘要 图形和背景关系的可逆性不仅解释了转喻映射的可逆现象,而且为转喻生成和识解1的认知机制提供了统一的解释框架。转喻的生成和识解是发生在不同时空、认知操作路向相反的两个认知过程,在研究中将它们混为一谈或偏倚其一都是不足取的。 The reversal of Figure-Ground organization not only illuminates the reversibility of metonymic mappings but also finds its way to set up a holistic framework to elaborate the cognitive mechanisms in generating and construing metonymy which are two reverse cognitive processes occurring in different time and space,and,therefore,it is inadvisable and misleading to mix up the two processes or only pay attention to either of them in metonymic research.
作者 卢军羽
机构地区 景德镇陶瓷学院
出处 《当代外语研究》 2015年第11期24-29,77,共6页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
基金 教育部人文社科青年项目"英汉事件交替动词的语义聚类特征与句法互动研究"(编号15YJC740051)的阶段成
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Alac, M. gc S. Coulson. 2004. The man, the key, or the car: Who or what is parked out back.'? [J~. Cognitive ScienceOnline (12) : 21-34.
  • 2Barcelona, A. 2002. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update [A]. In Renfi Dirven ~ Ralf P6rings (eds.). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast [C]. Berlin ~ New York. Mouton de Gruyter. 207-78.
  • 3Boersma, P. 2007. Some listener-oriented accounts of haspir~ in French [J]. Lingua 117.- 1989-2054.
  • 4Baylis, G.C. ~ J. Driver. 1995. One-sided edge assignment in vision: Figure-ground segmentation and attention to objects[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science (4) : 140-46.
  • 5Croft, W. 2002 [19931. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies [A]. In Ren~ Dirven ~ Ralf P6rings (eds.). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast [C]. Berlin New York.- Mouton de Gruyter. 161-205.
  • 6Dirven, R. 1999. Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata [A]. In K-U. Panther ~ G. Radden (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 275-76.
  • 7Fillmore, C. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding [J]. Quadernidi Semantica (6): 222-54.
  • 8Huang Liqiang ~ H. Pashler. 2009. Reversing the attention effect in figure-ground perception [J]. Psychological Science 20:1199-1201.
  • 9Julesz, B. Textons. 1984. The elements of texture perception, and their interactions [J]. Nature 290: 91-97.
  • 10Koch, P. 1999. Frame and contiguity: On the cognitive bases of metonymy and certain types of word formation [A]. In K-U. Panther ~ G. Radden (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.. John Beniamins. 139-68.

二级参考文献64

  • 1刘正光.论转喻与隐喻的连续体关系[J].现代外语,2002,25(1):61-70. 被引量:110
  • 2张辉,周平.转喻与语用推理图式[J].外国语,2002,25(4):46-52. 被引量:54
  • 3刘正光.隐喻研究的三个层次与主要领域[J].外语学刊,2007(3):21-27. 被引量:30
  • 4Croft, W. The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Melaphors and Metonymies [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1993(4): 335-370.
  • 5Feyaerts. K. Befining the Inheritance Hypothesis: Inleraetion etween Metaphorie and Metonymie Hierarchies[A]. In A.Bareeluna (ed.) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads:A Cognitive Perspective [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.
  • 6Goosens, L. Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Melonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic Action [A]. In L.Goosens el al. (eds.)By, Word of Mouth:Metaphoi, Metonymy and Linguis'tic Action in a Cognitive Perspective [C]. Amsterdam: John Beujamins Publishing Company, 1995.
  • 7Haser, Metaphor; MetonynO, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics [M]. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, 2005.286.
  • 8Jaeohson. R. Quest for the Essence of Language [J].Diogenes, 1965(51):21-37.
  • 9KOvecses, Z. & G. Radden. Melonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistics View [J]. Cognitive Linguistics', 1998(1):37-77.
  • 10Laknff, G & M. Johnson. Metaphors" We Live by [M]. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1980.

共引文献198

同被引文献23

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部