摘要
"以审判为中心",要反对侦查和审判及任何一个阶段在诉讼中享有"重心"的位置。以审判为中心不能理解为以"审判阶段"为中心,也不能理解为仅对"定罪"证据必须经过审判确定。"出罪"与"入罪"同样应当受到司法的严格控制,这是以审判为中心的完整内涵。法官的角色定位应体现我国司法实践的现实需要。审判中心主义对职权主义证据制度的直接影响就体现在对法官调查义务的坚持上,强调法官对证据收集和审查的无可推卸的责任。
The connotation of"Centered on trial"should be opposed to the concept that any stage would be the core stage of litigation."Centered on trial"does not mean the trial stage is the core stage of litigation,and does not infer we could only investigate the evidence of conviction in the trial stage. Acquittal and incrimination should both get the strict control of justice,which constitutes the whole connotation of"Centered on trial". The judge's role should reflect the real need of justice practice in our country. In the context of trial centrality,judge must puts emphasis on his duty of inquiry,collecting evidence and examining evidence,which is the direct affection on the evidence system of authority principle.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期70-80,共11页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重大课题(14ZDA017)"依法独立行使审判权
检察权保障机制研究"
国家社科一般项目(13BFX068)"刑事诉讼中的财产处置问题研究"
关键词
以审判为中心
重心论
证据规则
诉讼模式
Centered on trial
The theory of core stage of litigation
Rules of evidence
Litigation mode