期刊文献+

我国仲裁管辖权异议若干问题探析 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着仲裁的不断发展,通过仲裁解决的纠纷越来越多。但是并非所有的民商事纠纷都可以提交仲裁解决,因此仲裁庭对当事人提交的争议事项是否有管辖权就成为了需要解决的重要问题。那么对仲裁庭的管辖权可以提出哪些异议?由谁提出?对管辖权提出的异议应该由谁处理?异议时间是否应该限制?我国现行仲裁立法以及司法解释对有些问题作出了规定,有些则没有规定。本文采用横向比较的方法,将国内立法与国外立法比较,国内立法与国内实践比较,对我国仲裁的现状提出了完善的建议。 With the development of arbitration, there are more and more disputes settled through arbitration. However not all civil disputes and Commercial disputes can be solved through arbitration, therefore it's a major issue to be settled that whether the arbitration tribunal have jurisdiction on disputes submitted by parties. What objections about the jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal could be put forward? And who have the right to put forward? Who ought to handle objections? Whether we should limit the time of objections? China's current legislation and judicial interpretation on arbitration fail to regulate all issues above. This essay adopts transverse comparison method to compare the legislation both at home and abroad, and compare the domestic legislation with practice. Thus some advices will be put forward pointed at present situation of arbitration.
作者 熊小芳
出处 《北京仲裁》 2015年第2期59-69,共11页 Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词 仲裁 仲裁庭 仲裁管辖权 异议 arbitration jurisdiction objection the arbitration tribunal arbitration
  • 相关文献

同被引文献10

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部