期刊文献+

单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的疗效对比研究 被引量:12

Comparison on clinical efficacy of single port laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的临床疗效,为临床治疗提供参考。方法回顾性分析我院收治的异位妊娠患者的临床病历资料,其中行单孔腹腔镜手术的病例为观察组(37例),行传统腹腔镜手术的病例为对照组(75例)。比较两组的临床相关指标及术后并发症情况。结果观察组术中出血量少于对照组,住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者手术时间、术后排气时间及住院总费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组并发症发生率5.41%,对照组10.67%,两组发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后3个月腹壁切口美容满意度评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论单孔腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠具有出血量少、术后恢复快,并发症少且兼具微创、美观的特点,可作为手术治疗异位妊娠时的首选术式。 Objective To comparison the clinical efficacy of single port laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopie surgery in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy, to provide a reference for clinical treatment. Methods The data of patients with ectopic pregnancy in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, patients in observation group (37 cases ) underwent single port laparoscopic surgery while control group (75 cases) were treated by conventional laparoscopic surgery. Clinical related indexes and postoperative complications in two groups were conducted. Results The amount of bleeding during the operation in observation group was less than that in control group, the hospitalization time was shorter than that in control group, the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). There was no statistical significance on operative time, postoperative exhaust time and total hospitalization costs between observation group and control group (P 〉 0. 05 ). The incidence of complications in observation group was 5.41% while it was 10.67% of control group, there was no statistical significance between the two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The satisfaction score about abdominal wall wound beauty in observation group was higher than that in control group 3 months after surgery, the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusions Single port laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy has characteristics of less bleeding, rapid recovery postoperative, less complication, minimally invasive and beauty, which can be used as the first choice in treating ectopic pregnancy.
作者 尹悦
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2016年第5期639-641,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 单孔腹腔镜 传统腹腔镜 异位妊娠 临床疗效 Single port laparoscopic surgery Conventional laparoscopic surgery Ectopic pregnancy Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献94

  • 1戴钟英.异位妊娠与非妇产科疾病的鉴别诊断[J].实用妇产科杂志,2005,21(6):334-335. 被引量:5
  • 2姚冬梅,胡斐,陈雯,濮德敏.异位妊娠发病因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(6):712-714. 被引量:31
  • 3Sugerman HJ,Kellum JM,Engle KM,et al.Gastric bypass for treating severe obesity.Am J Clin Nutr,1992,55(2 Suppl):S560-S566.
  • 4Benotti PN,Forse RA.The role of gastric surgery in the multidisciplinary management of severe obesity.Am J Surg,1995,169:361-367.
  • 5Pories WJ,MacDonald KG Jr,Morgan EJ,et al.Surgical treatment of obesity and its effect on diabetes:10-year follow up.Am J Clin Nutr,1992,55(2 Suppl):S582-S555.
  • 6Demaria EJ,Jamal MK.Surgical options for obesity.Gastroenterol Clin North Am,2005,34:127-142.
  • 7Schauer PR,Ikramuddin S,Hamad G,et al.Laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery:current technique.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech,2003,13:229-239.
  • 8Wittgrove AC,Clark GW,Tremblay LJ.Laparoscopic gastric bypass,Roux-en-Y:Preliminary report of five cases.Obes Surg,1994,4:353-357.
  • 9Huang CK,Lee YC,Hung CM,et al.Laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass for morbidly obese Chinese patients:learning curve,advocacy and complications.Obes Surg,2008,18:776-781.
  • 10de la Fuente SG,Demaria EJ,Reynolds JD,et al.New developments in surgery:Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).Arch Surg,2007,142:295-297.

共引文献181

同被引文献80

引证文献12

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部