期刊文献+

超声骨刀联合高速涡轮机拔除下颌埋伏第三磨牙的临床应用 被引量:47

Piezosurgery Combined with Contra-angle High Speed Turbine Handpiece in the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨超声骨刀联合高速涡轮钻微创拔除下颌埋伏第三磨牙胚的应用。方法 :选取正畸科医生要求拔除下颌阻生智齿牙胚的患者104例。随机分为2组,超声骨刀联合高速涡轮机组作为研究组,单纯高速涡轮机为对照组,研究组54例,对照组50例。比较分析2组患者术后情况。结果:研究组患者手术时间较对照组明显缩短,肿胀、疼痛程度较对照组轻微,张口度较对照组为大,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:反角高速涡轮机联合超声骨刀拔除下颌智齿牙胚,手术创伤小、时间短、施力准确、并发症少,病人痛苦小,安全性高,值得临床推广。 Objective: To discuss the clinical application of piezosurgery combined with contra-angle high speed turbines in the minimally invasive extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth. Methods: 104 orthodontics patients require extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group(54 cases)used piezosurgery combined with contra-angle high speed turbines by means of cervical odontotomy to remove the impacted mandibular wisdom teeth. The control group(50 cases) just used simple contra-angle high speed turbines. A comparative analysis of two groups of patients was made after extraction. Results: The operation time length of the patients in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group. Symtoms and signs as swelling and pain degree in experimental group, were relatively minor than those in the control group. Mouth opening degree in experiment group was better compared with the control group; the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion:Piezosurgery combined with contra-angle high speed turbine handpiece demonstrate mini-invasive effects in the exodontia of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth, and worthy of promotion.
出处 《口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2016年第1期38-41,共4页 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2011B061300054)
关键词 阻生齿 拔牙 超声骨刀 反角高速手机 impacted tooth tooth extraction piezosurgery contra-angle high speed turbines
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献60

  • 1匡世军,周燕武,张志光,苏凯.下颌低位近中水平埋伏阻生牙两种拔除方法的比较研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,2(2):106-108. 被引量:18
  • 2翁素清,张贺志.对羧基苄胺明胶海绵预防下颌阻生智齿拔除术后干槽症[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1996,14(3):241-241. 被引量:6
  • 3周建国,步中琦,朱亚芳.下颌第三磨牙阻生两种拔除术的并发症比较[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2006,16(3):250-252. 被引量:16
  • 4Hansson P,Ekblom A,Thomsson M,et al.Pain development and consumption of analgesics after oral surgery in relation to personality characteristics[J].Pain,1989,37 (3):271-277.
  • 5Benediktsd6ttir IS,Wenzel A,Petersen JK,et al.Mandibular third molar removal:Risk indicators for extended operation time,postoperative pain,and complications[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2004,97 (4):438-446.
  • 6Gbotolorun OM,Arotiba GT,Ladeinde AL.Assessment of (actors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65 (10):1977-1983.
  • 7Noroozi AR,Philbert RF.Modern concepts in understanding and management of the "dry socket" syndrome:Comprehensive review of the literature[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2009,107(1):30-35.
  • 8Diniz-Freitas M,Lago-Mendez L,Gude-Sampedro F,et al.Ped-erson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,45 (1):23-26.
  • 9Graziani F,D'Aiuto F,Arduino PG,et al.Perioperative dexamethasone reduces post-surgical sequelae of wisdom tooth removal.A split-mouth randomized double-masked clinical trial[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2006,35 (3):241-246.
  • 10Ren YF,Malmstrom HS.Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(10):1909-1921.

共引文献174

同被引文献279

引证文献47

二级引证文献275

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部