摘要
我国现行的仲裁保全措施制度存在着未赋予仲裁庭发布保全措施的权力及人民法院予以执行的明确规范、没有赋予当事人申请仲裁后直接向人民法院寻求保全措施救济权等缺陷,其弥补的最好方法应是主要通过修订《仲裁法》的方式予以重构,以便于使用者适用。在仲裁庭发布的保全措施类型方面应以非单边为限,并对证据保全以外的保全措施要以紧急性等为条件。我国还应当建构人民法院执行仲裁庭发布的临时措施规范,并完善人民法院本身为该种措施发布主体的规则。
China ' s law on interim measures for arbitration has lots of flaws such as prohibi- ting arbitral tribunals from issuing this type of orders, no express provisions for the people's courts to enforce those tribunal-ordered provisional remedies, and no explicit rules for parties to seek directly conservatory measures from the people~ s courts. The best method for overcoming the flaws abovementioned is to revise the Arbitration Act to facilitate the users to apply. In the forthcoming revised Arbitration Act, in terms of the types of interim measures issued by arbitral tribunals, China should not allow preliminary orders and shall enact certain conditions like "ur- gency" for those interim measures other than evidential matters. China should also construct the norms of people's courts' enforcement of interim measures issued by arbitral tribunals and im- prove the rules for the peoples' courts as the subject issuing conservatory measures.
出处
《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期104-115,共12页
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
关键词
仲裁
保全措施
仲裁庭
法院
arbitration
protective measure
arbitral tribunal
judicial court