摘要
齐学之名起于齐地,通常认为其源流为齐稷下学和汉之齐学,是地域之学,并随汉之今文经学的歇息而戛然而止。实际上,齐学具有强大的延伸力和包容性,远非齐地之学可以概括。稷下学、汉之太学的官学性质及其思想文本的经典化,促成它渐变为中国学术主流之一。魏晋时,齐学的支流渐与道教相合。魏晋后,齐学的主流因学术重心的迁移而式微。在清代中晚期,齐学又随着今文经学的复兴而再兴。反观齐学的演进轨迹,我们看到自由之学术,要以回应时代的呼唤为内容,要为时代之进步而张目。
Qi Studies, named after the land of Qi, is generally regarded as a local academic model originating from Jixia Studies of Qi Kingdom and Qi Studies in the Han Dynasty. Qi Studies reaches the end after the New Text Confucianism becomes obsolete. Qi Studies is marked by immense tolerance and diversity, which can hardly be covered by the term of studies in the land of Qi. With help of its official academic status and canonization of its ideas, Qi Studies becomes established as one of the major schools of Chinese academia. In the Wei and the Jin Dynasties, one part of Qi Studies became mixed with Tao- ism. Afterwards, Qi Studies declined in influence as a result of the shift of focus. Following the New Text Confucianism renaissance, Qi Studies revived in the middle and late Qing Dynasty. The development of Qi Studies proves that academic development needs to be in tune with the demands of the times and stim-ulate its development.
出处
《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期1-8,共8页
Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
齐学
稷下学
汉之齐学
清今文经学
Qi Studies
Jixia Studies
Qi Studies in the Han Dynasty
New Text Confucianism in the Qing Dynasty