期刊文献+

中医学的科学定位 被引量:3

Scientific Positioning of Traditional Chinese Medicine
原文传递
导出
摘要 有关中医学是否科学的争论已经持续了百年之久,尚无统一共识。争论的混淆点之一是因为在讨论中没有分清"科学"与"科学的"的区别。本文认为中医学本身尚不能归入纯科学的范畴,但中医学的主体是科学的,同时也存在部分未经证实的中医学说。本文试将医学的科学水平分为8级:医学科学、科学的医学、医学体系、医学理论、医学学说、医学信仰、医学迷信及医学欺诈。中医学和西医学均可以在这个的定位体系中找到自己的位置。当前中医学科学水准还明显低于现代西医学,尚有待进一步的研究和提高。 Whether traditional Chinese medicine( TCM) could be categorized as a kind of science or not has been a controversial issue over last century. Part of the confusion is caused by the indistinguishable usage of Chinese words " science" and " scientific" during discussion. According to western academic standards,TCM cannot be considered as pure or conventional science. However,in author's view,the foundation of a majority part of TCM practice is probably scientific,while many TCM theories remain unproved. In this article,medical theories and practices are classified based on scientific content into eight levels: medical science,scientific medicine,medical system,medical theory,medical opinion,medical belief,medical cultism,and medical fraud. Both Western medicine and TCM are positioned in this system accordingly. Currently,the scientific level of TCM is much lower than that of Western medicine,and more research is needed for its improvement.
作者 李永明
出处 《中国中西医结合杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期266-268,共3页 Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词 中医学 科学定位 医学科学分级 中医科学 traditional Chinese medicine scientific positioning grading of medical science science of Chinese medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1韩启德:中医不科学不代表不正确[N].中国中医药报,2014年5月26日.
  • 2朱德:题词.新针灸学(朱琏编)[M].南宁:广西人民出版社,1980:扉页.
  • 3李约瑟.中国古代科学[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2001..
  • 4朱清时.中医是复杂性科学[N].中国中医药报,2004—08—16.

共引文献11

同被引文献71

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部