期刊文献+

最大似然频谱估计法与周期图最大值法的性能比较分析 被引量:5

Performance Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Spectral Estimator Compared with PM Estimator
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究宽带信噪比(RSNW)和有效功率谱宽度对最大似然(ML)法多普勒频率估计结果的影响,采用探测概率和正确估计频率标准差来描述ML算法对仿真信号和实验数据的处理性能,并与周期图最大值(PM)法所得结果进行比较。经理论仿真和对中国科学院上海光学精密机械研究所1.5μm全光纤相干测风激光雷达实测数据的反演处理,结果表明,高谱宽度下,ML算法的正确估计频率标准差与相比PM可降低0.5 MHz,达到90%的探测概率所需宽带信噪比ML算法与PM算法相比低2 d B。表明ML算法的正确估计频率标准差能与PM算法相比不高于1.1 MHz,探测概率高9%。要获得风速精度小于1 m/s同时探测概率在80%以上,所需宽带信噪比大于-14 d B。 The effect of the wideband signal-to-noise ratio (RSNW) and the effective power spectral width on the Doppler frequency estimation performance using maximum likelihood (ML) estimator have been studied. The performance of the ML algorithm is applied to simulation signal. Experimental data are described by the detection probability and the standard deviation (SD), and also compare with periodogram maximum (PM) estimator. The data are acquired by 1.5 μm all fiber coherent Doppler lidar in Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The results indicate that ML′s SD can enhance 0.5 MHz higher than PM′s under the same spectral width. ML is close to PM under the narrow spectral width. To satisfy the 90% detection probability, the required RSNW is 2 dB smaller than PM′s. In the real-process, ML′s SD can be 1.1 MHz lower than the PM, and the detection probability is 9% lower than PM. To obtain the wind speed accuracy less than 1 m/s while the detection probability is above 80%, the required RSNW is larger than -14 dB.
出处 《中国激光》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期230-237,共8页 Chinese Journal of Lasers
基金 总装预研基金(513210604)
关键词 遥感 相干多普勒测风激光雷达 多普勒频率估计 最大似然法 周期图最大值法 正确估计频率标准差 探测概率 remote sensing coherent Doppler wind lidar Doppler frequency estimation maximum likelihoodestimator periodogram maximum estimator good estimate standard deviation detection probability
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Fujii T, Fukuchi T. Laser Remote Sensing[M]. Florida: The Chemical Rubber Company Press, 2005: 472-700.
  • 2贾晓东,孙东松,舒志峰,张飞飞,夏海云.相干激光雷达中望远镜的优化及探测性能分析[J].光学学报,2015,35(3):1-8. 被引量:18
  • 3Rye B, Hardesty M. Discrete spectral peak estimation in incoherent backscatter heterodyne lidar I spectral accumulation and the Cramer- Rao lower bound[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1993, 31(1): 16-27.
  • 4Rye B, Hardesty M. Discrete spectral peak estimation in incoherent backscatter heterodyne lidar II correlogram accumulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1993, 31(1): 28-35.
  • 5Frehlich R. Performance of maximum likelihood estimators of mean power and Doppler velocity with a priori knowledge of spectral width [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1999, 16(6): 1702-1709.
  • 6Sobolev S V, Timokhin S A. Maximum likelihood estimates of signal parameters oflaser Doppler systems[J]. Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing, 2014, 50(6): 566-576.
  • 7王纪强,张春熹,马宗峰,欧攀,张晓青.激光多普勒测速参数估计的Cramer-Rao下限[J].中国激光,2008,35(9):1419-1422. 被引量:9
  • 8靳笑晗,汪岳峰,竹孝鹏,刘继桥,刁伟峰,陈卫标.最大概似法在多普勒激光测风雷达中的应用研究[J].光学仪器,2012,34(5):28-33. 被引量:5
  • 9Kameyama S, Ando T, Asaka K, Hirano Y. Performance of discrete-Fourier-transform-based velocity estimators for a wind-sensing coherent Doppler lidar system in the Kolmogorovturbulence regime[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2009, 47(10): 3560-3569.
  • 10Frehlich R, Yadlowsky M. Performance of mean-frequencyestimators for Doppler radar and lidar[J]. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 1994, 11 (5): 1217-1230.

二级参考文献62

共引文献44

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部