期刊文献+

飞机起飞擦机尾事件的风险预测研究 被引量:5

Risk Prediction of Aircraft Tail Strike Events during Take-off Phase
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为更加客观地预测飞机起飞时发生擦机尾事件的风险概率,帮助航空公司根据擦机尾事件风险特征制定针对性的训练计划,采用飞行快速存取记录器数据,利用科尔莫格罗夫-斯米诺夫检验(K-S检验)方法模拟飞机起飞离地仰角值的可能分布,并根据起飞离地仰角值的分布特征对飞机起飞擦机尾事件的风险进行预测。最后以某公司B737-800飞行中队及整个机队的飞机起飞离地仰角值为例进行分布检验,结果表明:各中队及整个机队的飞机起飞离地仰角值均服从正态分布,根据正态分布的概率密度函数,对各个机队飞机起飞擦机尾事件的风险可能性进行预测计算,得出三中队出现擦机尾事件的风险最小,二中队出现擦机尾事件的风险最大。该方法可进一步普及至其他不安全事件的风险预测,并可分析不同飞行员和机场的风险差异。 The aim of this study is to objectively predict the risk probability of commercial aircrafts tail strike events during take-off phase based on the Quick Access Recorder(QAR)data,and thereby propose a more targeted training program for the airline.To achieve this purpose,the paper puts forward a method based on flight performance and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test(K-S test)in order to verify whether pitch attitude during take-off is subject to a certain distribution.Then,the paper predicts the risk of aircraft tail strike during take-off according to the characteristics of the distribution.Finally,the paper uses the real QAR data collected from a Boeing 737-800 fleet to verify the effectiveness of the method.The results show that the take-off pitch attitude of each fleet group and the entire fleet are all subjected to normal distribution.The No.3fleet group has the lowest probability of tail strike while the No.2fleet group has the highest.The method in this paper can also be used to predict the risk of other safety events and analyze the risk of different pilots and airports.
出处 《安全与环境工程》 CAS 2016年第2期153-156,共4页 Safety and Environmental Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(U1333112 61304207)
关键词 飞机起飞 擦机尾事件 离地仰角值 正态分布 风险预测 QAR数据 aircraft take-off tail strike event pitch attitude normal distribution risk prediction QAR data
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Statistical Summary of Commer- cial Jet Airplane Accidents Worldwide Operations 1959-2012 [R]. Seattle, WA: Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 2013.
  • 2舒平,李福海.起飞阶段擦机尾事故分析与预防措施[J].国际航空,2008(11):40-42. 被引量:4
  • 3毛吉星.波音737飞机机尾擦地的检查和维修[J].航空维修与工程,2012(5):78-80. 被引量:4
  • 4Chan P W. A tail strike event of an aircraft due to terrain-in- duced wind shear at the Hong Kong international airport[J]. Meteorlogical Applications, 201 2,19 (3) : 325-333.
  • 5Corner K,Paterson N. Method,Apparatus and Computer Pro- gram Product for Helicopter Tail Strike Warning: United Stated,6737987B2 [P]. 2004-05-18.
  • 6Theriault R J. Impending Aircraft Tail Strike Warning Dis- play Symbology :United Stated,6121899[P]. 2000-09-19.
  • 7Korsun N,Poplavskii B K. Estimation of systematic errors of on- board measurement of angle of attack and sliding angle based on integration of data of satellite navigation system and identifica- tion of wind velocity[J]. Journal of Computer and Systems Sci- ences International ,2011,50(1) : 130-143.
  • 8Romanenko L G,Romanenko L G,Samarova G G. Aircraft longi- tudinal control without a piteh command in the autopilot[J]. Russian Aeronautics ,2014,57(4) : 361-367.
  • 9Kalmykov A, Barsuk V E. Investigation of gyroplane takeoff with the use of main rotor collective pitch[J]. Russian Aeronau- tics, 2011,54(4) : 329-333.
  • 10Hadjimiehael M. A fuzzy expert system for aviation risk assess- ment[J]. Ezpert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 6512- 6519. .

二级参考文献34

共引文献40

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部