期刊文献+

从认知语言学角度探究“萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说” 被引量:1

Exploring Sapir- Whorf Hypothesis From the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在探讨语言与思维的关系时,"萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说"不可或缺。这一假说使人们对语言与思维之间关系的讨论达到高潮,却也遭到不少诟病。随着认知语言学的兴起,这一假说又重新回到人们的视野中。拟从认知语言学的角度,探究"萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说",发现认知语言学实证研究主要从三个方面有力地支持了这一假说:(1)语言对空间认知的影响;(2)语言对时间认知的影响;(3)语言对性别认知的影响。 When discussing the relationship between language and thought,Sapir- Whorf Hypothesis( SWH) is indispensable. SWH made the discussion reach the peak,however,it had been criticized for a long time. With the development of cognitive linguistics,SWH attracts attention again. This paper aims at probing SWH from the perspective of cognitive linguistics,and finds that empirical studies of cognitive linguistics are for SWH from three aspects: 1) language’s impacts on the cognition of space; 2)language’s impacts on the cognition of time; 3) language’s impacts on the cognition of gender.
作者 王敏
出处 《鸡西大学学报(综合版)》 2016年第3期131-133,共3页 JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition
关键词 “萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说” 语言与思维 认知 SWH language and thought cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献63

  • 1杨忠,张绍杰.认知语言学中的类典型论[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(2):3-10. 被引量:107
  • 2卢植.语言相对论对当代认知语言学的影响[J].外语学刊,2006(3):32-37. 被引量:18
  • 3Casasanto, D. 2008. Who's afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in tem- poral language and thought [J]. Language Learning 58: 63-79.
  • 4Chen, J-Y. 2007. Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001) [J]. Cognition 104: 427-436.
  • 5Choi, S. & M. Bowerman. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns[J]. Cognition 41: 83-121.
  • 6Corbett, G. 2000. Number[M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Evans, V. & M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction [M]. Edinburgh.. Edinburgh University Press. 96-102.
  • 8Gopnik, A. 2001. Theories, language and culture: Whorf without wincing [A]. In M. Bowerman&S. Levinson (eds.). 2001. 45-69.
  • 9Gumperz, J. & S. Levinson. (eds.). 1996. Rethinking Linguistics Relativity [C]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 10Hoijer, H. (ed.). 1954. Language in Culture : Conference on the Interrelations of Language and Other Aspects of Culture [C]. Chicago.. The University of Chicago Press.

共引文献30

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部