血管内介入栓塞术与开颅夹闭术治疗脑动脉瘤的临床疗效比较

Comparison Between the Clinical Efficacy of Interventional Endovascular Embolization and Craniotomy Clipping Surgery in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms

目的探讨血管内介入栓塞术与开颅夹闭术治疗脑动脉肿瘤的效果作用。方法将我院2014年7月~2015年7月收治54例脑肿瘤患者随机分为对照组和治疗组,每组27例,其中对照组行开颅夹闭术治疗,治疗组行血管内介入栓塞治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果治疗1年后,治疗组的总有效率为92.59%,高于对照组的70.37%,P〈0.05;治疗组的并发症发生率为7.41%,低于对照组的33.33%,P〈0.05。结论血管内介入栓塞术治疗脑动脉瘤的临床疗效优于开颅夹闭术,可有效促进治愈效果,降低并发症发生率。

Objective To investigate the effect of embolization craniotomy clipping surgery and endovascular treatment of cerebral artery tumor. Methods Selected 54 cases of brain tumor patients from July 2014 to July 2015 in our hospital, which were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, 27 cases in each group, the control group craniotomy clipping surgery treatment, within the treatment group underwent endovascular embolization, therapeutic effect between the two groups of patients. Results After 1 year of treatment, the total effective rate of treatment group was 92.59%, significantly higher than the 70.37%, P〈0.05, incidence of complications in the treatment group, 7.41%, significantly lower than the 33.33% in the control group, P〈0.05. Conclusion The clinical efficacy of interventional endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms significantly better than craniotomy clipping surgery, can effectively promote healing effect, reduce the incidence of complications.