期刊文献+

家族化管理、两权分离与会计稳健性 被引量:4

Family Management,Ownership and Management Separation and Accounting Conservatism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 家族上市公司中,实际控制人或其他家族成员参与管理与否影响到两类代理问题和会计信息供求,从而影响会计稳健性。本文基于2008~2012年间A股家族上市公司数据,探讨家族化管理对会计稳健性的影响。研究发现,在家族化管理的情景下,会计稳健性相对较低,且家族化管理程度越高,会计稳健性越低。进一步检验发现,两权分离能显著弱化家族化管理程度较弱一方对会计稳健性的正向促进作用。结论证明了家族企业治理模式中高管职业化制度推行的重要性与必须性,同时也为中国公司治理领域高管激励与约束、职业经理人市场的完善提供了借鉴意义。 In family listed companies, the actual controller or other family members involved in the management or not affects the two agency problems which further affects the supply and demand of accounting information and influences the accounting conservatism. By observing the data of A-share listed family company from the year 2008 to 2012, this paper investigates the effect of family management on the accounting conservatism. The results indicate that accounting conservatism is lower under the situation of family management, and the higher degree of family management, the lower degree of the accounting conservatism. Further examination finds that throughthe moderating effect exerted by separation of owning and managing, it can significantly weaken the positive promoting effect of lower family management on accounting conservatism. This conclusion proves that the importance and necessity of professional managers in family firms, and also provides the reference for the managers' incentive and constraint and perfection for the professional manager market of corporate governance.
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期17-23,共7页 Securities Market Herald
基金 教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划项目(IRT0926) 国家自然科学基金重点项目"我国集团企业跨国治理与评价研究"(批准号71132001) 国家自然科学基金面上项目"董事会断层 非正式层级与决策质量研究"(71572081) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"商业银行董事会治理与风险承担研究"(NKZXB1239)等资助
关键词 家族化管理 会计稳健性 两权分离 family management, accounting conservatism, separation of two rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1All A., Chen T.Y., Radhakrishnan S.. Corporate disclosures by family fimls[J]. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2007, 44: 238-286.
  • 2Anderson R., Mansi S., Reeb D.. Founding Family Ownership and the Agency Cost of Debt[l]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003, 68(2): 263-285.
  • 3Ball, R. and Shivakumar, L.. Earnings Quality it: U.K. Private Firms: Comparative Loss Recognition[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics, 205, (38): 83-128.
  • 4Basu, S.. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings[j]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1997, 24(1): 3-37.
  • 5Claessens S., Djankov S., Lang L. H. P.. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations[l]. Journal of financial Economics, 2000, 58(1): 81-112.
  • 6Chen, S. P., Chen, X. and Cheng, Q.. Do Family Finns Provide More or Less Voluntary Disclosure? [J].Joumal of Accounting Research, 2008, (46): 499-536.
  • 7Demsetz H., Lehn K.. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1985: 1155-1177.
  • 8Garc i a Lara J M, Garcia Osma B, Penalva F. Accounting conservatism and corporate governance[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 20119, 14(1):161-201.
  • 9LaFond, R., and R. L. Watts. The information role of conservatism, ].j]. The Accounting Review, 2008, 83: 447-478.
  • 10Morck R., Yeung B.. Agency Problems in Large Fanfily Bminess Groups[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2003, 27(4): 367-382.

共引文献1448

同被引文献83

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部