摘要
两岸专利侵权赔偿种类及计算方法存在相似和差异,两岸都规定了权利人损失、侵权人获利、合理许可费的赔偿种类,但对法定赔偿和惩罚性赔偿的态度不同。在计算权利人损失方面,大陆以专利产品或侵权产品的合理利润为基准,台湾以专利权人的损害或专利被侵权前后获利的差额作为赔偿额。在计算专利侵权人的获利方面,大陆以侵权产品的营业利润或销售利润为基准,台湾以侵权人获得利益作为赔偿额。大陆以已有的许可费为基准,台湾以收取的合理权利金为基础计算赔偿额。台湾至今未规定法定赔偿,大陆《专利法》第四次修改虽增设了惩罚性赔偿,但实际效果值得追问。
There are similarities and differences between cro ss-strait patent infringement compensation classification and calculation method.The two share compensations of the loss of the obliges, the infringers' profit,and reasonable royalty,but hold different attitudes toward statutory damages and punitive damages.When calculating the loss of the obliges,the Mainland takes reasonable profit of patent products as the benchmark,while Taiwan adopts the loss of obliges or the difference before and after the patent infringement.When calculating the profit of patent infringers,the Mainland takes operating profit or sales profit of infringed products as the benchmark,while Taiwan adopts the benefit as compensation.Besides,the Mainland takes the existing license fee as the benchmark,while Taiwan adopts reasonable royalty when calculating the amount of compensation.Taiwan has not yet provided statutory compensation,and the Mainland has added punitive damages in the fourth amendment of the patent law,but there are few follow-up of its actual effect.
出处
《行政与法》
2016年第3期121-128,F0003,共9页
Administration and Law
关键词
侵权人
专利权人
惩罚性赔偿
赔偿种类
compensation classification
calculating method comparison
punitive compensation