摘要
《画谱》不是《画语录》的定本,而是讹误百出的伪本。《画谱》还冒然地对《画语录》做了诸多删改,不过这些删改客观上尚未导致石涛画学思想的根本变异,删改者主观上也没想达成这种效果。我们似乎只能说,石涛思想被打了折扣。这些删改有些是因为理解上出了偏差,更多的则可能与中国古代尊崇儒学的风气有关,即借助思想锋芒的弱化和圣贤的感召力,便于书的流通与传播,便于石涛思想为世人所接受。
Hua Pu is not the final version of Hua Yu Lu but a fabrication with various kinds of errors. In addition,the maker of Hua Pu rashly deletes or modifies many texts of Hua Yu Lu. However,these deletions and modifications have not resulted in fundamental variance of Shi Tao＇s painting theory. The maker doesn＇t even have the subjective desire to create such effect. It seems that we can only say that Shi Tao＇s thought has been discounted. Some of these deletions and modifications are due to the maker＇s misunderstandings; others are presumably related to the ancient custom of respecting Confucianism. That is to say,the maker wants to make it easier for the book to spread or for Shi Tao＇s thought to be accepted,by weakening the hard-edged thought and counting on charisma of sages.
出处
《琼州学院学报》
2016年第1期101-106,共6页
Journal of Qiongzhou University
基金
海南大学"中西部高校综合实力提升工程"子项目"海南文化软实力科研创新团队"(01J1N10005003)
