摘要
近年,线性遗产越来越受到国际社会的广泛关注。但是,在欧洲、美国和中国不同文化体系中,对线性遗产的称谓不尽相同,这在一定程度上对线性遗产国际交流与合作造成了障碍。对宪章、公约、法案、标准和国内外研究论文等涉及线性遗产的相关文献进行回顾并比较后可知:源于欧洲的文化线路概念更重视对文化的挖掘与保护;兴起于美国的遗产廊道概念对景观和游憩功能给予了格外关注;而我国新近引入的欧美概念与原有的本土概念混用,造成了线性遗产概念的泛化。我国学术界应尽快统一线性遗产概念,建立交流顺畅的线性遗产学术平台,进而推动我国和国际线性遗产保护事业的持续发展。
While linear heritage is increasingly attracting attention across the world, its terminology differs from cultures of Europe, America and China, bringing challenges for international communications and collaborations. By taking a comparative perspective, this article reviews the various forms of literatures relat- ed to linear heritage, including charters, conventions, bills, and standards as well as research papers, and re- veals that the "cultural route" term adopted by European countries reflects a focus on the significance of the heritage item and advocates for preservation; the "heritage corridor" term adopted in the U.S. is rendered with special emphasis on the heritage item as a landscape and recreation resort; in the case of China, these imported terms are used loosely and interchangeably with those coined in China, causing the confusion in the field. The article advocates a unified scheme of the concepts and terminology on linear heritage to be set up and a platform for unhindered academic communications to be established so as to promote the sustain- able development of linear heritage in China and the world.
出处
《东南文化》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期31-38,共8页
Southeast Culture
基金
国家自然科学基金项目"我国廊道遗产空间结构与功能协同演化研究"(项目编号41301152)
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(13YJCZH175)
关键词
线性遗产
文化线路
遗产廊道
文献综述
linear heritage
cultural heritage
heritage corridor
literature review