期刊文献+

生产率、要素禀赋与中国企业出口行为选择——理论与经验研究 被引量:5

Productivity, Factor Endowment and Chinese Companies' Export Behavior:An Theoretical and Empirical Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 新-新贸易理论的假设条件并不完全符合中国实际国情,在我国要素禀赋变化后,对工资水平、贸易成本等理论中的关键假设也将产生重大影响。将新-新贸易理论拓展到包含两个发达国家、两个发展中国家的分析框架,对中国企业的出口选择进行了分析。同时,文章使用OP法测算了国有、私营、外资、港澳台等四种类型企业的生产率水平,结果显示我国出口企业整体生产率水平高于国内市场的企业,并不存在"生产率悖论";国有企业具有垄断地位、要素占有、市场准入等竞争优势,因而生产率高于外资类及私营企业。最后提出了通过企业改革促进产业结构调整与经济增长的相关建议。 The assumptions of the new-new trade theory are not completely in line with China's actual conditions. After the change of factor endowments, trade costs and wages will also change. The paper expands the theory to include two developed countries and two developing countries, and then analyzes the Chinese enterprises' choice of exporting. At the same time, it uses OP method to measure the productivity level of four types of enterprises. The results show that the productivity of the export enterprises is higher than that of the non-export enterprises in our country. The problem of "productivity paradox" does not exist; The state-owned enterprises have advantages in monopoly position, factor possession, and market entry, and so on, so their productivity is higher than that of foreign and private enterprises. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions on promoting industrial structure adjustment and economic growth through enterprise reform.
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期46-63,共18页 International Economics and Trade Research
关键词 新~新贸易理论 要素禀赋 出口选择 new-new trade theory factor endowment the choice of export enterprises.
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献51

  • 1郭庆旺,贾俊雪.中国全要素生产率的估算:1979—2004[J].经济研究,2005,40(6):51-60. 被引量:1222
  • 2王志刚,龚六堂,陈玉宇.地区间生产效率与全要素生产率增长率分解(1978—2003)[J].中国社会科学,2006(2):55-66. 被引量:448
  • 3Antras, P. , Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 11, 2003, pp. 1375--1418.
  • 4Baldwin, R. E. , Heterogeneous Firms and Trade: Testable and Untestable Properties of the Melitz Model. Working Paper, 2005/6.
  • 5Bernard, A. B. , Redding, S.J. and Schott, P. K. , Multi-Product Firms and Trade LiberalizatiorL Working Paper, 2006/12.
  • 6Helpman, E. , Melitz, M.J. and Yeaple, S.R. ,Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms. The American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2004, pp. 300--316.
  • 7Melitz, M.J. , The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggegate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, Vol. 71, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1695--1725.
  • 8Namini, J.E. and Lopez, R. A. , Random Versus Conscious Selection into Export Markets Theory and Empirical Evidence. Working Paper, 2006/10/11.
  • 9Dai Mi, Maitra, M. and Yu Miaojie, 2011, "Unexcep- tional Exporter Performance in China? The Role of Processing Trade", SSRN Working, No. 1963652.
  • 10Baily, Activity: M M. N.,C Hulten, and D. Campbell, 1992, "Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants", Brookings Papers on Economic , 187-267.

共引文献1587

同被引文献90

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部