期刊文献+

基于突发事件的机场进离场时隙分配研究 被引量:6

Slot Allocation of Airport Arrival and Departure Based on the Emergence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对机场发生突发事件导致机场容量急剧下降而难以满足航班时隙需求的情况,建立进离场时隙分配模型,为受影响的航班重新分配时隙。以进离场航班的总延误损失为目标函数,将旅客平均延误时间作为时隙分配公平性指标,首次引入生物地理学优化算法对时隙分配模型求解。计算首都机场282个进离场航班重新分配时隙耗时为320 s,所求得的解与RBS算法相比,总延误损失减少了32.8%,旅客平均延误时间降低了27.8%。该模型和算法表现出高效、快速的时隙分配能力,可为决策者的应急决策提供有力保证。 According to the airport capacity declines sharply by the emergence,which cannot meet the demand of slots,and establish the model of slot reallocation for the affected flights. The total delay loss as the objective function,and the average delay of passengers as fairness index. The model is for the first time being solved by the biogeography- based optimization. It takes320 s for 282 flights to reallocation slot. The result compares with RBS the total delay loss is reduced by 32. 8%,and the average delay of the passengers is reduced by 27. 8%. The model and the algorithm are efficient for the slot allocation,and provide enough time and efficiency guarantee for decision makers in dealing with the emergence.
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版)》 CAS 2016年第1期28-32,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Information & Management Engineering
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(NJ20140017) 江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BK20130821)
关键词 突发事件 地面等待策略 进离场 时隙分配 生物地理学优化算法 emergent events ground holding policy arrival and departure slot allocation biogeography-based optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1陶世群,蒲保兴.基于遗传算法的多级目标非平衡指派问题求解[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(8):80-85. 被引量:25
  • 2徐肖豪,李雄.航班地面等待模型中的延误成本分析与仿真[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2006,38(1):115-120. 被引量:87
  • 3周茜,张学军,柳重堪.时隙分配算法在CDMGDP程序中的应用[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2006,32(9):1043-1045. 被引量:21
  • 4Thomas W M Vossen. Fair Allocation Methods in Air Traffic Management[D]. Smith School of Business, University of Maryla, 2002.
  • 5Thomas Vossen, Michael Ball. Optimization and mediated bartering models for ground delay programs [R]. NEXTOR technical report, 2005.
  • 6Thomas W M. Vossen, Michael O Ball. Slot trading opportunities in collaborative ground delay programs [R]. NEXTOR technical report, 2005.
  • 7Robert L Hoffman. Defining. Measuring, and implementing equity [R]. Equitable Allocation of Limited Resources Final Report, 2003.
  • 8Terrab M, Odoni A R, Deutsch O L. Ground-holding strategy for ATC flow control[C]// AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. Boston: MA, 1989: 1635-1646.
  • 9Hoffman R L, Hall W, Ball M O, et al. Collaborative decision making in air traffic flow management[R]. NEXTER Research ReportAA #RR-99-2, UC Berkeley, 1999.
  • 10Sankararaman R. Impact assessment of dynamic slot exchange in air traffic management[D]. University of Maryland, 2004.

共引文献119

同被引文献26

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部