期刊文献+

不同嗅觉刺激模式对嗅觉fMRI的影响研究 被引量:2

The Effects of Different Odor Stimulation Paradigms On Olfactory fMRI Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过观察嗅觉中枢的激活情况,探讨不同的嗅觉刺激模式是否会影响嗅觉f MRI结果。方法分别选择两种不同的嗅觉刺激模式对同一受试者进行嗅觉f MRI检查,选择双侧初级嗅觉皮层区为ROI,观察其在两种模式下的激活情况以及BOLD信号强度的变化,比较两者之间是否有所差别。结果 16名正常志愿者两种嗅觉刺激模式下的ROI区激活体素数无统计学差异(定时模式为69.00±80.23,触发模式为102.81±151.44,P值=0.42),且平均BOLD时间-信号强度变化曲线也无统计学差异(P值=0.167)。结论无论是定时模式还是触发模式,在刺激持续时间内均存在至少一次的有效的吸气相,嗅觉中枢的激活反应也是没有差异的,因此不同嗅觉刺激模式对嗅觉f MRI结果是没有影响的。 Objective To study the effects of different odor stimulation paradigms on olfactory f MRI results by observing the activation of olfactory central system. MethodsTwo different olfactory stimulation paradigms olfactory f MRI were executed on the same subjects,and extracted bilateral primary olfactory cortex area as ROI, observing its activation responding and BOLD signal intensity changes, to see whether there are any differences between the two paradigms. Results The ROI area activation responding of both two odor stimulation paradigms of 16 normal volunteers showed no statistical differences(fixed paradigm were 69.00±80.23, trigger paradigm were 102.81±151.44, P values=0.42), and there was no statistical differences between the two average time of BOLD signal intensity curve(P values=0.167). Conclusion No matter what the paradigm is, there should be at least one effective inspiratory phase in the duration of odor stimulation,it should cause the same activation response in the olfactory center. Therefore, different paradigms of olfactory stimulation do not effect on the result of olfactory f MRI.
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2016年第4期1-3,F0002,共4页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
基金 天津市卫生局攻关课题(13 KG107) 天津市科委支撑计划重点项目(15ZCZDSY00520)
关键词 嗅觉 功能性磁共振成像 初级嗅觉皮层 Olfaction Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Primary Olfactory Cortex
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1张洪英,高歌军,滕皋军.阿尔茨海默病的情景记忆fMRI研究[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2007,5(3):38-40. 被引量:6
  • 2黎元,冯晓源,汤伟军,沈天真,蒋胜洪,陈怡平,Paul M.Matthews.汉字词组语义辨别脑功能区定位的fMRI研究[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2004,2(2):1-4. 被引量:6
  • 3Barresi M, Ciurleo R, Giacoppo S, et al. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction neurodegenerative diseases[J J Neurol Sci, 2012, 323(1-2):16-24.
  • 4Wang J, Eslinger P J, Doty R L, et al. Olfactory deficit detected by fMRI in early Alzheimer's disease[J]. Brain Res, 2010, 1357: 184-194.
  • 5Wang J, Sun X, Yang Q x. Methods for olfactory fMRI studies: Implication of respiration[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014, 35(8): 3616-3624.
  • 6Patton HD. Taste, olfaction Lnd visceral sensation[J]. Medical Physiology and Biophysics Philadelphia: Saunders, 1960:374-377.
  • 7Toledano A, Borromeo S, Luna G, et al. Objective assessment of olfactory function using functional magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 2012, 63(4): 280-285.
  • 8Zelano C, Montag J, Johnson B, et al. Dissociated representations of irritation and valence in human primary olfactory cortex[J]. J Neurophysiol, 2007, 97(3): 1969-1976.
  • 9Raj D, Anderson A W, 6ore J C. Respiratory effects in human functional magnetic resonance imaging due to bulk susceptibility changes[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2001, 46(12): 3331- 3340.
  • 10Smejkal V, Druga R, Tintera J. Olfactory activity in the human brain identified by fMRI[J]. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2003, 104(6): 184-188.

二级参考文献29

  • 1钱丽霞,祁吉,尹建忠,李鹏.Alzheimer病~1H磁共振波谱成像[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2005,3(3):14-18. 被引量:12
  • 2[1]Tan L,Spinks JA,Gao J,et al. Brain activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words:a functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp,2000, 10:16-27.
  • 3[2]Bronen RK,Fletcher RA,Shankweiler JM,et al. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature, 1995, 373:607-609.
  • 4[3]Heiss WD,Karbe H,Weber LG. Speech-induced cerebral metabolic activation reflects recovery from aphasia. J Neurol Sci, 1997, 145:213-217.
  • 5[4]Herbster AN, Mintun MA,Nebes RD, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow during word and non-word reading.Hum Brain Mapp 1997, 5:84-92.
  • 6[5]Petersen SE, Fox PT,Synder AZ, et al. Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by words and word-like stimuli. Science,1990, 249: 1041-1044.
  • 7[6]Pugh KR,Shaywitz BA,Shaywitz SE,et al. Cerebral organization of component processing in reading. Brain,1996, 119:1221-1238.
  • 8[7]Ohyama M,Senda M,Kitamura S,et al. Role of the nondominant hemisphere and undamaged area during word repetition in poststroke aphasics. A PET activation study. Stroke, 1996, 27:897-903.
  • 9[8]Howard D,Patterson K,Wise R,et al. The cortical localization of the lexicons. Brain, 1992,115: 1769-1782.
  • 10[9]Beauregard M,Chertkow H, Bub D,et al. The neural substrate for concrete, abstract, and emotional word lexica:A positron emission tomography study. J Cogn Neurosci,1997,9:441-461.

共引文献10

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部