期刊文献+

不同晶体时间响应参数对脉冲辐射测量统计涨落影响评估

Effects evaluation of pulsed radiation measurement statistical fluctuation caused by time responses of scintillators
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为评估不同时间响应参数的无机晶体所造成的统计涨落对零功率堆瞬发中子时间常数α测量结果的影响,构建数值模型对其进行计算。结果表明:原本为负常数的α曲线,经过不同时间响应参数的晶体卷积后,α值由常数变成曲线;且在时间零点附近急剧变化,甚至出现正数值;晶体时间响应参数越大,偏离α值越多;对于不同的晶体,时间零点附近α值变化区间不一样,慢晶体的变化区间最长。 Different time responses of scintillators result in different fluctuation in pulsed radiation measurement which play great influence on the measurement of time constant α of zero power assembly. Mathematical models are established to evaluate the influence in this paper. Results show that the initial negative constant values of α turns to curves due to convolution of different time responses of scintillators. Values of α changes drastically and there are even positive values of α. The slower the time reoponse is, the more deviation of α. Especially, the time variation section of α changes differently around the zero point of time axis for different scintillators. The time variation section of α is the longest for the slowest time response of scintillators.
出处 《中国测试》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第3期21-23,27,共4页 China Measurement & Test
关键词 零功率堆 瞬发中子时间常数 无机晶体 时间响应参数 统计涨落 zero power reactor instant neutron time constant inorganic scintillator time response parameter statistical fluctuation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1陈俊杰,易忠,孟立飞,肖琦,刘超波.基于欧拉方法的多磁偶极子分辨技术[J].航天器环境工程,2013,30(4):401-406. 被引量:16
  • 2郭洪生.DPF中子产生机制和中子参数测量技术研究[Z].中国工程物理研究院年报.绵阳:中国工程科学研究院科技年报编辑部,2003.
  • 3郭洪生.静态次临界装置衰变常数的瞬态测量方法[Z].中国工程物理研究院年报.绵阳:中国工程科学研究院科技年报编辑部,2003.
  • 4吕敏.脉冲辐射束测量中的统计起伏问题[J].物理学报,1983,32(2):216.

二级参考文献12

  • 1易忠,孟立飞.“探测”双星磁性仿真分析计算[J].装备环境工程,2006,3(3):37-42. 被引量:7
  • 2Davis K,Li Yaoguo,Nabighian M. Automatic detection of UXO magnetic anomalies using extended Euler deconvolution[J].{H}GEOPHYSICS,2010,(03):G13-G20.
  • 3Reid A B,Allsopt J M,Granser H. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution[J].{H}GEOPHYSICS,1990,(01):80-91.
  • 4Hansen R O,Suciu L. Multiple-source Euler deconvolution[J].{H}GEOPHYSICS,2002,(02):525-535.
  • 5Beiki M. New techniques for estimation of source parameters[D].Uppsala Universitet,2011.
  • 6Heath P. Analysis of potential field gradient tensor data:forward modeling,inversion and near-surface exploration[D].The University of Adelaide,2007.
  • 7Oruc B. Location and depth estimation of point-dipole and line of dipoles using analytic signals of the magnetic gradient tensor and magnitude of vector components[J].{H}Journal of Applied Geophysics,2010,(01):27-37.
  • 8Mikhailov V,Pajot G,Diament M. Tensor deconvolution:a method to locate equivalent sources from full tensor gravity data[J].{H}GEOPHYSICS,2007,(05):I61-I69.
  • 9Pedersen L B,Rasmussen T M. The gradient tensor of potential field anomalies:some implications on data collection and data processing of maps[J].{H}GEOPHYSICS,1990,(12):1558-1566.
  • 10Clive Foss. Improvements in source resolution that can be expected from inversion of magnetic field tensor data[J].The Leading Edge,2006,(01):81-84.doi:10.1190/1.2164761.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部