期刊文献+

颈椎前凸角度减小对融合术后邻近节段影响的生物力学研究 被引量:3

The biomechanical effects on adjacent segments after two-level ACDF with reduced lordosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨颈椎前路减压融合术(anterior cervical discectomy and fusion,ACDF)后前凸角度减小对邻近节段的生物力学影响。方法 取6具成人尸体颈椎标本(C2~C7),制备为完整组、C4-6双节段原位固定组、C4-6双节段加压固定(前凸减小)组,于脊柱三维运动实验系统上进行前屈、后伸、侧屈和旋转4种运动状态的测定。记录各组固定节段Cobb角、标本整体及邻近节段的活动度和小关节内压力,比较固定后前凸角度减小对邻近节段运动和压力负荷的影响。结果 完整组前凸Cobb角为13.5°±4.1°,原位固定组15.7°±4.6°,差异具有统计学意义;前凸减小组前凸Cobb角为9°±4°,与完整组差异具有统计学意义。原位固定组及前凸减小组的标本整体活动度在前屈、后伸、侧屈和旋转4种运动状态下均较完整组减小,而上位及下位邻近节段(C3-4、C6-7)活动度则增加,原位固定组和前凸减小组的上位活动度在前屈和后伸运动状态与完整组比较,差异均有统计学差异;原位固定组和前凸减小组的下位活动度在前屈、后伸、旋转运动状态与完整组比较,差异均有统计学差异;上位邻近节段C3-4活动度在后伸运动中,前凸减小组大于原位固定组,差异有统计学意义;下位C6-7活动度在前屈和后伸运动中,前凸减小组大于原位固定组,差异有统计学意义;原位固定组及前凸减小组的上位C3-4小关节内峰值压力和平均压力在前屈、后伸、侧屈、旋转运动中均较完整组高,在后伸与侧屈运动中差异具有统计学意义;前凸减小组与原位固定组比较,C3-4小关节内压力呈下降趋势,差异无统计学意义。结论 颈椎标本双节段ACDF术后,上、下邻近节段活动度和上位小关节内压力升高,而术后颈椎前凸角度的减小会进一步增加邻近节段活动度,可能因此而加速邻近节段退变。 Objective To study the biomechanical effect on adjacent segments of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods 6 adult human cervical spine specimens (C2-C7) were tested under the following 3 conditions: intact cervical spine group, C4-6 ACDF with normal lordosis group, C4-6 ACDF with reduced lordosis group. The specimens were tested in flexion, extension, bending and rotation on the spine 3D motion experiment system. The Cobb angle, overall range of motion (ROM), ROM and loads of facet joints at adjacent segments were measured. Results The lordosis Cobb angle was 13.5氨4.1- in intact cervical spine group, 15.7氨4.6- in C4-6 ACDF with normal lordosis group, 9.0氨4.0- in C4-6 ACDF with reduced lordosis group, respectively. After operation the overall ROM of specimens reduced in flexion, extension, bending and rotation, but the ROM of upper and lower adjacent segments increased. The ROM of upper segments (C3-4) in flexion and extension, as well as that of lower segments (C6-7) in flexion, extension and rotation, had significant difference. The extension ROM of upper segment (C3-4) of C4-6 ACDF with reduced lordosis group was found greater than that of C4-6 ACDF with normal lordosis group and the flexion and extension ROM at lower segment (C6-7) of C4-6 ACDF with reduced lordosis group were also greater. Increased max and average stress on C3-4 facet joints was observed in all the 4 types of motion after ACDF and the differences in extension and bending were statistically significant. Comparing C4-6 ACDF with reduced lordosis group and C4-6 ACDF with normal lordosis group, a stress decreasing trend was observed along with the reduced lordosis angle but had no significant difference. Conclusion After 2 level ACDF on cervical spine specimens, ROM of adjacent segments and stress on facet joints increased. The ROM of specimens with reduced lordosis is higher than those with normal lordosis, which may accelerate ASD.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期353-360,共8页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
基金 北京市科技计划课题支持项目(Z111100074911005)Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Plan Program
关键词 颈椎 脊柱融合术 生物力学 Cervical vertebrae Spinal fusion Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Robinson R, Smith G. Anterolateral cervical disc removal and in- terbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome[J]. Bull John Hopkins Hosp, 1955, 96: 223-224.
  • 2田伟,阎凯,韩骁,于杰,靳培浩,韩晓光.Bryan人工间盘置换与前路减压融合治疗颈椎退行性疾病的中期随访研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(2):97-104. 被引量:34
  • 3王洪立,姜建元,吕飞舟,马晓生,夏新雷,王立勋.颈椎前路融合术后邻近节段退变性疾病的原因分析及治疗策略[J].中华骨科杂志,2014,34(9):915-922. 被引量:26
  • 4Lund T, Oxland TR. Adjacent level disk disease--is it really a fu- sion disease?[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2011, 42(4): 529-541. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.07.006.
  • 5Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous ante- rior cervical arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999, 81(4): 519-528.
  • 6Kretzer RM, Hsu W, Hu N, et al. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model[J]. Spine, 2012, 37(13): E778-E785. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824780b8.
  • 7Wu WJ, Jiang LS, Liang Y, et al. Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cer- vical disc disease: a retrospective study[J]. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21 (7): 1374-1382. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2131-9.
  • 8Hwang SH, Kayanja M, Milks RA, et al. Biomechanical compari- son of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis[J], Spine J, 2007, 7(2): 216-221.
  • 9Martin S, Ghanayem A J, Tzermiadianos MN, et al. Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two- level, straight versus lordotic fusion[J]. Spine, 2011, 36(17): 1359-1366. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318222d4ad.
  • 10Panjabi MM. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spi- nal adjacent-level effects[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007, 22(3): 257-265.

二级参考文献179

  • 1田伟,刘波,李勤,胡临,李志宇,袁强,孙玉珍.人工颈椎间盘置换手术的临床初步应用体会[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):37-40. 被引量:34
  • 2王文军,朱永顺,王麓山,姚女兆,刘利乐.前路开槽减压固定加人工椎间盘置换术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(3):182-185. 被引量:10
  • 3Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott's disease: a preliminary report. JAMA, 1911, 57(9): 885- 886.
  • 4Hibbs RA. An operation for progressive spinal deformities: a pre- liminary report of three cases from the service of the orthopaedic hospital. 1911. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007(460): 17-20.
  • 5Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease af- ter lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(17): 1938-1944.
  • 6Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Mahenfort M, et al. Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(15): 1701-1707.
  • 7Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS. The impact of adjacent segment de- generation on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(5): 503-507.
  • 8Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, et al. Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1987, 12(2): 97-104.
  • 9Rahm MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Dis- ord, 1996, 9(5): 392-400.
  • 10Hayashi T, Arizono T, Fujimoto T, et al. Degenerative change in the adjacent segments to the fusion site after posterolatcral lum- bar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation--a minimum 4- year follow-up. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi, 2008, 99(5): 107-113.

共引文献81

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部