期刊文献+

《汉语大词典》书证引古典文献失误拾零

Samples of Mistakes about Classical Documents Used as Documentary Evidence in Great Chinese Dictionary
下载PDF
导出
摘要 书证是辞书的血肉,其质量是衡量辞书编纂水平的重要标准。古典文献又是辞书书证的重要来源,它不仅在一定程度上反映了词的源流,也为立目提供可靠的依据。《汉语大词典》书证在引古典文献时出现的失误类型包括文字失误、书证出处有误及篇名称引错误、意引失误、引用格式不一、词条收录欠妥等。此外书证时代较晚及以孤证为书证的情形同样影响了辞书的科学性,在编撰中也应引起重视。同时,作为全国性的权威辞书,《汉语大词典》更应认真修订以提升词典的典范性。 Documentary evidence is the key to dictionary,and it is an important measure of lexicography standards. Classical literature is an important part of dictionary evidence. It reflects not only the origin of the word,but also provides a reliable basis for establishing item. Taking Great Chinese Dictionary as an example,the author gives the failure types including text errors,missing text,source,and title errors. In addition,thte age of the dictionary evidence is late and isolated corroboration is used as documentary evidence,which also affect the scientific feature of the dictionary.Meanwhile,as a national authoritative dictionary,Great Chinese Dictionary should be carefully revised in order to enhance the level of the dictionary.
作者 黄毓芸
出处 《成都工业学院学报》 2016年第1期68-70,共3页 Journal of Chengdu Technological University
关键词 辞书编纂 书证 《汉语大词典》 古典文献 dictionary compilation documentary evidence Great Chinese Dictionary classical literature
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1阮元.十三经注疏[M].北京:中华书局,1980年..
  • 2段玉裁.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981..
  • 3陈滞.礼记集注[M].北京:中国书店,1985:60.
  • 4陆德明.经典释文[M].北京:商务印书馆,1936.
  • 5胡培晕.仪礼正义:第三十卷[M].清代木犀香馆刻本.
  • 6陈复华.古代汉语词典[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998.
  • 7孙诒让.周礼正义[M].北京:中华书局,1987..
  • 8陈寿.三国志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:859.
  • 9王先谦.庄子集解[M].北京:中华书局,2012.56-58.
  • 10王光汉.辞书与书证[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1995,19(6):82-85. 被引量:2

共引文献1344

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部