论二次价值转形

Discussion on Quadratic Value Transition

庞巴维克未经论证就断言,一旦把马克思计算过程中的成本价格由价值转变为生产价格,所谓转形问题在逻辑上是决无可能解决的。对于庞巴维克挑起的争端,一些学者尝试完成马克思省略掉的计算。但是,这些学者的研究有的分析框架存在重大缺陷;有的企图用取消价值转形的方式来解决这个问题;有的对价值转形问题理解不到位;有的在表达方式上存在种种缺陷。尽管马克思没有进一步考察二次价值转形并列举相应的数值例子,但他关于如何进行二次价值转形的计算,尤其是成本价格的修订,已经给出了明确的规定,这些规定足够让我们去正确地考察和计算二次价值转形。总之,价值转形是一个真问题,而马克思价值转形理论的百年难题则是一个伪问题。

Bohm-Bawerk has asserted without proof that once the cost price in the Marxian calculation process is transformed from value to production price,the so-called transition problem can never be solved in logic.For the dispute provoked by Bohm-Bawerk,some scholars have tried to complete the calculation omitted by Marx.However,there are some significant deficiencies in the analysis framework of the research of some scholars such as Bortkiewicz;some scholars attempt to solve this problem by canceling value transition;some do not understand the problem of value transition well;and there are various deficiencies in the expression ways of some scholars.Although Marx did not further investigate quadratic value transition and list the relevant numerical examples,but he gave explicit provisions for the calculation of quadratic value transition,in particular the revision of cost price.These provisions are enough for us to correctly investigate and calculate quadratic value transition.In short,value transition is a real problem,while the problem of Marxian theory on value transition puzzling the world for a hundred years is a pseudo problem.