期刊文献+

自膨式与球囊扩张支架治疗椎动脉颅内段狭窄患者的临床疗效对比分析 被引量:4

The Clinical Analysis of Self Expanding and Balloon Expandable Stent for Vertebral Artery Intracranial Segment Stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨自膨式与球囊扩张支架治疗椎动脉颅内段狭窄患者的临床疗效差异。方法选取我院神经内科住院部椎动脉颅内段狭窄患者96例,根据支架置入类型将其分为两组,A组50例和B组46例。A组采用自膨式支架治疗,B组采用球囊扩张支架治疗。比较两组患者临床疗效的差异。结果治疗前,两组患者Mori分型、椎动脉颅内段狭窄率、NIHSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后,全部患者椎动脉颅内段残余狭窄率均<30%,且椎动脉颅内段狭窄率与NIHSS评分,Mori B、C分型比例明显低于治疗前,比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中A组椎动脉颅内段残余狭窄率明高于B组,A组NIHSS评分与围术期并发症发生率明显低于B组,比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论自膨式支架治疗椎动脉颅内段狭窄患者的临床疗效显著,有助于显著改善神经恢复功能与降低围术期并发症发生风险。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy difference of self expanding and balloon expandable stent for vertebral artery intracranial segment stenosis. Methods 96 cases of vertebral artery intracranial segment stenosis from neurology inpatient department in our hospital were selected, according to the types of stent implantation,all were divided into two groups, A group(n=50) were given self expanding stent in the treatment, B group(n=46) were given balloon expandable stent in the treatment, the clinical efficacy beetween the two groups were compared. Results Before treatment, Mori type,the ratio of intracranial vertebral artery stenosis, NIHSS score compared between the two groups had no statistically significant differences(P〉0.05), after treatment,all patients with the ratio of intracranial vertebral artery stenosis was 30%, Mori A type proportion,the ratio of intracranial vertebral artery stenosis and and NIHSS score were significantly higher than pre-therapy, the proportion of Mori B, C type were significantly lower than that pretherapy, the difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05),in which intracranial vertebral artery stenosis rate of A group was significantly higher than B group,NIHSS score and peri-operative complication rate of A group were significantly lower than that B group, the difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of self expanding stent in the treatment of patients with vertebral artery intracranial segment stenosis is significant, it is helpful to improve the nerve function recovery and peri-operative complication risk.
出处 《现代诊断与治疗》 CAS 2016年第2期200-202,共3页 Modern Diagnosis and Treatment
关键词 自膨式支架 球囊扩张支架 椎动脉颅内段狭窄 疗效 对比 Self Expanding Stent Balloon Expandable Stent Vertebral Artery Intracranial Segment Stenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献74

  • 1徐晓彤,姜卫剑,杜彬,董可辉,金旻,王清河,马宁.颅内椎基底动脉狭窄支架成形术后的远期疗效[J].中国卒中杂志,2008,3(11):798-802. 被引量:14
  • 2赵瑞,周晓平,刘建民.椎基底动脉狭窄血管介入治疗新进展[J].临床神经外科杂志,2004,1(3):137-139. 被引量:3
  • 3陆军,刘芳,刘加春,王大明,李金.症状性椎动脉狭窄临床治疗的现状[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(4):237-239. 被引量:3
  • 4王子亮,李天晓,翟水亭,曹会存,薛绛宇,孟艳莉,白卫星,刘建.症状性椎基底动脉狭窄经皮腔内支架成形的初步研究[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2007,4(3):168-171. 被引量:3
  • 5Savitz SI, Caplan LR. Vertebrobasilar disease [J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352:2618 - 2626.
  • 6Ederle J, Bonati LH, Dobson J, et al. Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randommized trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8:898 - 907.
  • 7Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Ame- rican Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline [J ]. Circulation, 2006, 113 : ed09 - e449.
  • 8SSYLVIA Study Investigators. Stenting of symptomatic atheroselerotic lesions in the vertebral or intraeranial arteries (SSYLVIA) : study results[J]. Stroke, 2004, 35:1388-1392.
  • 9Edgell RC, Yavagal DR, Drazin D, et al. Treatment of vertebral artery origin stenosis with anti-proliferative drug-eluting stents [J]. J Neuroimaging, 2010, 20:175 - 179.
  • 10Lanzino G,Kanaan Y,Perrini P,et al.Emerging concepts in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms:stents,coated coils,and liquid embolic agents[J].Neurosurgery,2005;57(1):449-59.

共引文献40

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部