期刊文献+

经桡动脉介入治疗无保护左主干病变的可行性与安全性研究 被引量:2

The feasibility and safety of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery lesion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经桡动脉行无保护左主干病变介入治疗的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析92例行介入治疗的无保护左主干病变患者,其中经桡动脉途径49例,经股动脉途径43例,观察两组患者的临床特征、病变特点、器械选择、并发症及主要心脏不良事件(MACE)。结果临床特征、复杂分叉病变、手术成功率两组之间差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05);支架直径、长度,支架释放压力与最大扩张压力两组之间差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。手术时间、投照时间、造影剂用量两组之间差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。桡动脉组与股动脉组比较,术后住院时间较短[(2.2±0.4)d比(3.3±0.5)d](P<0.01)、局部血管并发症较少[2.0%(1/49)比14.0%(6/43),P<0.05]。12个月的随访期间两组MACE率相似[8.2%(4/49)比7.0%(3/43),P=0.83]。结论经桡动脉行无保护左主干病变介入治疗缩短了住院时间,减少了外周血管并发症,具有良好的可行性与安全性。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention( PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery lesion by transradial approach. Methods A retrospective analysis of 92 cases of interventional treated patients with unprotected left main lesion was performed,including 49 cases by radial artery approach and 43 cases by femoral arterial approach,observing the clinical features,lesion characteristics,equipment selection,the complications and major adverse cardiac events( MACE) between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference in clinical features,complex bifurcation lesions,or surgical success rate between two groups( all P〉0. 05). There was no statistically significant difference in stents diameter,length,release pressure or the maximum expansion pressure between two groups( all P〉0. 05). There was no statistically significant difference in operation time,exposure time,or dosage of contrast agent between two groups( all P〉0. 05). In transradial group post operation hospitalization duration was significantly shorter-( 2. 2 ± 0. 4) days vs.( 3. 3 ± 0. 5)days( P〈0. 01),the rate of local vascular complications was significantly lower 2. 0%( 1 /49) vs. 14. 0%( 6 /43)( P〈0. 05),comparing with transfemoral group. However,the rate of MACE in 12 months follow-up was similar in two groups 8. 2%( 4 /49) vs. 7. 0%( 3 /43)( P = 0. 83). Conclusions PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery lesion by transradial approach can shorten the duration of hospital stays,reduce the peripheral vascular complications and have good feasibility and safety.
出处 《中国心血管杂志》 2016年第1期27-31,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 无保护左主干 预后 Angioplasty transluminal percutaneous coronary Unprotected left main coronary artery Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Ziakas A,Klinke P,Mildenberger R,et al.Comparison of the radial and femoral approaches in left main PCI:a retrospective study[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2004,16(3):129-132.
  • 2Wood F,Bazemore E,Schneider JE,et al.Technique of left main stenting is dependent on lesion location and distal branch protection[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2005,65(4):499-503.
  • 3Feldman DN,Swaminathan RV,Kaltenbach LA,et al.Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention:an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry(2007-2012)[J].Circulation,2013,127(23):2295-2306.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536.
  • 4Chhatriwalla AK,Amin AP,Kennedy KF,et al.Association between bleeding events and in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention[J].JAMA,2013,309(10):1022-1029.DOI:10.1001/jama.2013.1556.
  • 5Jolly SS,Yusuf S,Cairns J,et al.Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes(RIVAL):a randomised,parallel group,multicentre trial[J].Lancet,2011,377(9775):1409-1420.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2.
  • 6Valgimigli M,Saia F,Guastaroba P,et al.Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for acute myocardial infarction:a propensity score-adjusted and-matched analysis from the REAL(REgistro regionale Angiop Lastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna)multicenter registry[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2012,5(1):23-35.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.018.
  • 7Bertrand OF,Belisle P,Joyal D,et al.Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions:a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis[J].Am Heart J,2012,163(4):632-648.DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.015.
  • 8Shah B,Bangalore S,Feit F,et al.Radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial or transfemoral approaches when performed by experienced operators[J].Am Heart J,2013,165(3):286-292.DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.016.
  • 9Hamon M,Pristipino C,Di MC,et al.Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions:position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology[J].EuroI ntervention,2013,8(11):1242-1251.DOI:10.4244/EIJV8I11A192.
  • 10Safley DM,Amin AP,House JA,et al.Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention:a cohort analysis from the Premier research database[J].Am Heart J,2013,165(3):303-309.e2.DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.004.

二级参考文献30

  • 1Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et ai. Coronary arterybypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention inpatients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease :5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial [ J ].Lancet, 2013, 381 : 629-638.
  • 2Farooq V, Head SJ, Kappetein AP, et al. Widening clinicalapplications of the SYNTAX Score[ J] . Heart, 2014,100 : 276-287.
  • 3Genereux P,Palmerini T, Caixeta A, et al. SYNTAX scorereproducibility and variability between interventionalcardiologists, core laboratory technicians, and quantitativecoronary measurements [ J ]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2011, 4 :553-561.
  • 4Nam CW,Mangiacapra F,Entjes R, et al. Functional SYNTAXscore for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011,58; 1211-1218.
  • 5De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,Kalesan B,et al. Fractional flowreserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronarydisease[ J]. N Engl J Med,2012,367 : 991-1001.
  • 6De Bruyne B. Multivessel disease: from reasonably incomplete tofunctionally complete revascularization [ J ]. Circulation, 2012,125: 2557-2559.
  • 7Genereux P,Palmerini T, Caixeta A, et al. Quantification andimpact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneouscoronary intervention : the residual SYNTAX ( Synergy BetweenPCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery ) score [ J ]. J Am CollCardiol, 2012, 59: 2165-2174.
  • 8Farooq V,Serruys PW, Bourantas CV, et al. Quantification ofincomplete revascularization and its association with five-yearmortality in the synergy between percutaneous coronaryintervention with taxus and cardiac surgery ( SYNTAX) trialvalidation of the residual SYNTAX score[ J]. Circulation, 2013 ,128: 141-151.
  • 9Farooq V,Girasis C,Magro M,et al. The CABG SYNTAX Score-an angiographic tool to grade the complexity of coronary diseasefollowing coronary artery bypass graft surgery : from the SYNTAXLeft Main Angiographic ( SYNTAX-LE MANS) substudy [ J ].Eurolntervention, 2013 , 8 ; 1277-1285.
  • 10Farooq V,Girasis C,Magro M,et al. The coronary artery bypassgraft SYNTAX Score : final five-year outcomes from the SYNTAX-LE MANS left main angiographic substudy [ J ].Eurolntervention, 2013 , 9: 1009-1010.

共引文献6

同被引文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部