期刊文献+

碳减排的路径选择——基于政府与市场关系冲突与整合的视角 被引量:1

Path Selection of Carbon Emission Reduction——Perspective of Conflict and Integration Based on the Relationship Between Government and Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着《京都议定书》的正式生效,碳交易市场作为新兴碳减排方式受到人们的普遍关注。学界对其看法褒贬不一,争论的焦点在于碳减排中是采取政府型环境政策还是市场型环境政策。在碳减排实践中,政府与市场在治理中不可避免地会发生冲突,理性的路径选择是在合理划分二者作用界域的基础上实现二者的整合。政府与市场都作为碳减排中的行动者,采用碳税和碳市场共存的方式,以实践为导向,从而发挥政府在碳交易市场中顶层设计的作用,同时也要发挥市场的作用,引导由强制减排到自愿减排的转变,实现碳减排治理的可持续治理。 With the " Kyoto Protocol" officially going into effect,carbon trading market as a new form of carbon emission reduction arouse common concern.Academic circles on the mixed views,the focus of debate in carbon emission reduction is to take the government environmental policy or market environment policy.In the practice of carbon emission reduction,the government and the market in governance will inevitably clash,path rational choice is to achieve the integration of the two on the basis of rational division of both the role of the precinct.Both government and the market as actors in carbon emissions use the method of carbon tax and carbon market coexistence with the guide of practice,therefore playing the role of the government in the carbon trading market in the top design and the role of the market.Meanwhile,it can lead to the change of compulsory emission reduction to voluntary emission reduction and realize the sustainable management of carbon emission reduction.
作者 李娉 马涵慧
出处 《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第1期13-17,共5页 Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
关键词 政府与市场 碳减排 角色冲突 整合途径 government and market carbon emission reduction role conflict integration approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

  • 1郭正林.论政府与市场结合的基本模式[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),1995,35(2):8-13. 被引量:14
  • 2王义桅.环境问题与国际制度变迁[J].国际论坛,2000,2(5):7-12. 被引量:4
  • 3马中 D.Dudek.总量控制与排污权效果[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999,11..
  • 4Joy Hyvarinoa and Duncan Brack, Clobal Environmental Institutions: Analysis and Options for Outage, Energy and Environmental Programme, Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA),Sep.2000.
  • 5UNEP : International Environmental Govemance : Report of the Executive Director, Naivabi, Koaya: United Nations Environmental Programme, 2001.
  • 6International Institute for Environment and Development (UED), "Designing a New Architecture for Global Environmental Governance—Opinion for WSSD" ,2002.
  • 7Joy Hyvarinc:n and Duncan Brack, Global Environmental Institutions: Analysis and Options for Change, Energy and Enviroranental Programme, Royal Institute of International Affairs ( RIIA ) , Sep. 2000.
  • 8Shona E H Dodds, W Bradnee Chambers and Norichika Kanie, Internaional Environmental Governance-The Question of Reform: Key Issues and Proposals ,United Nations University (UNU)/Institute of Advanced Studies (IAS), March 2002.
  • 9Lee A Kimball, "The Debate over a World/Global Environment Organisstion: A First Step toward Improved International Institutional Arrangements for Environment and Development?"Adil Najam,"The Case Against GEO, WEO,or Whatever- Else- EO,"in Duncan Brock and Joy Hyvarinea, eds., Gloobal Environmental Institutions: Perspectives on Reform, Sustainable Development Programme, Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) ,Aug.2002.
  • 10Konrad von Moltke, "Clustering International Environmental Regimes"; Lee A Kimball: "The Debate Over a World/Global Environment Organization: A First Step Toward Improved International Institutional Arrangements for Environment and Development?"in Duncan Brack and Joy Hyvarinen,eds., Global Environmental Institutions : Perspectives on Reform, Sustainable Development Programme, Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIh),Aug.2002.

共引文献230

同被引文献21

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部