期刊文献+

间伐对鼠类扩散林木种子的影响 被引量:1

Effects of Thinning on Seed Dispersal by Rodents in Secondary Forest
下载PDF
导出
摘要 间伐作为一种林业生产活动,将会对区域内的植物群落和动物种群及行为产生影响.为了解间伐对鼠类介导的种子扩散的影响,2012年4月在王屋山区选择未间伐和间伐林地作为样地,标记、释放山杏(Prunus armeniaca)种子,调查鼠类对种子扩散的影响.研究表明:1)未间伐区鼠类的捕获率为6.7%,间伐区为2.7%;2)间伐区乔木密度降低56.3%、灌丛密度降低72.7%;3)未间伐区种子的扩散速率(半存留时间2 d)显著快于间伐区(半存留时间10 d);4)未间伐区,鼠类对种子的埋藏深度为(4.3±0.1)cm,间伐区为(3.9±0.2)cm,二者差异显著;5)未间伐区,鼠类对种子的多次扩散率为20.3%,间伐区为4.4%,二者差异显著.结果显示,林木间伐导致林区生境和鼠类种群显著变化,造成鼠类贮食行为和种子命运发生改变,最终将影响林区的幼苗更新. As a common management strategy in forestry production,thinning could have a significant impact and interference on phytocoenosium and forest animals,and subsequently affect animal-mediated seed dispersal and forest regeneration. To understand the potential influence of thinning on the process of rodent-mediated seed dispersal,a study was conducted in April 2012. Seeds of Prunus armeniaca were marked and tracked in un-thinning and thinning forest in Mt. Wangwu area. The results showed that: 1)the relative density of rodent population drastically reduced from 6. 7% in un-thinning forest to 2. 7% in thinning forest; 2) the density of tree and shrub in thinning forest decreases from 56. 3% to 72. 7%; 3)seed dispersal rate in un-thinning forest( half survival time: 2 days) was significantly higher than in thinning forest( half survival time: 10 days); 4) the difference of burying depth between un-thinning forest( 4. 3 ± 0. 1) cm and thinning forest( 3. 9 ± 0. 2) cm was significant; 5) more scatter-hoarded seeds were retrieved and buried again in un-thinning forest( 20. 3%) than in thinning forest( 4. 4%). These results suggested that thinning have inevitable influence on plant community structure and the seed dispersal behavior of rodents,and finally affect the seed fate and seedling recruitment.
出处 《郑州大学学报(理学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第1期67-72,共6页 Journal of Zhengzhou University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2007CB109106)
关键词 林木间伐 鼠类 贮食行为 种子命运 埋藏深度 thinning rodents hoarding behavior seed fate burying depth
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1VANDER WALL S B.Food hoarding in animals[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1990.
  • 2FORGET P M,LAMBERT J,HULME P E,et al.Seed fate:seed predation,seed dispersal and seedling establishment[M].Wallingford:CAB International Publishing,2005.
  • 3Xin LAI,Cong GUO,Zhishu XIAO.Trait-mediated seed predation, dispersal and survival among frugivore-dispersed plants in a fragmented subtropical forest, Southwest China[J].Integrative Zoology,2014,9(3):246-254. 被引量:4
  • 4CHANG G,ZHANG Z B.Differences in hoarding behaviors among six sympatric rodent species on seeds of oil tea(Camellia oleifera)in Southwest China[J].Acta oecologica,2011,37(3):165-169.
  • 5DIRZO R,DOMINGUEZ C A.Seed shadows,seed predation and the advantages of dispersal[M].Dordrecht:Junk publishers,1986:237-249.
  • 6FARVIG N,BHNING-GAESE K,BLEHER B.Enhanced seed dispersal of Prunus africana in fragmented and disturbed forests?[J].Oecologia,2006,147(2):238-252.
  • 7KIRIKA J,FARWIG N,BHNING G K.Effects of local disturbance of tropical forests on frugivores and seed removal of a small-seeded Afrotropical tree[J].Conservation biology,2008,22(2):318-328.
  • 8刘滨,王嵘,刘映良,徐高福,陈小勇.不同干扰强度生境中啮齿动物对苦槠种子的取食和扩散[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(8):1668-1673. 被引量:6
  • 9ZHANG H M,WANG Y,ZHANG Z B.Domestic goat grazing disturbance enhances tree seed removal and caching by small rodents in a warm-temperate deciduous forest in China[J].Wildlife research,2009,36(7):610-616.
  • 10ZHANG Y F,TONG L,JI W H,et al.Comparison of food hoarding of two sympatric rodent species under interspecific competition[J].Behavioural processes,2013,92(3):60-64.

二级参考文献126

共引文献115

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部