期刊文献+

深基坑工程施工过程风险综合评价 被引量:36

Synthetic Evaluation on Risk of Deep Excavation Engineering Construction Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对当前对深基坑工程施工风险进行评价需要解决风险指标体系构建、指标权重分配和评价方法实现的问题,建立了证据理论结合区间数赋值的深基坑工程施工过程风险评价模型.依据深基坑工程的施工原理和管理过程,应用"工作分解结构-风险分解结构(WBS-RBS)"和"0-1"方法识别风险因素,建立深基坑工程施工过程风险评价指标体系.结合区间数理论和证据理论的优势,降低深基坑工程施工过程风险量化值的主观性,详述构建识别框架、确定可信度函数以及信息合成的方法与步骤.最后通过实例分析说明了该方法的合理性与可行性. For the three main problems remaining to be solved in the construction process of deep excavation engineering:building a risk index system,distributing the weight of evaluation indexes and evaluating the risk,this article builds a risk evaluation system based on the D-S(Dempster-Shafer)evidence theory combined with interval number theory.Firstly we identify the risk factors by"WBS-RBS"and"0-1"methods to build the risk index system based on the construction principle and management process of deep excavation.In order to decrease the subjectivity of the process of deep excavation risk quantification,then we combine the advantages of interval number theory and D-S evidence theory to specify the methods and procedures about how to build identifying framework,choose the reliability function and synthesize information.At last,the rationality and feasibility of the risk evaluation system are manifested by analyzing the example.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期491-498,共8页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 武汉市城乡建设委员会科技计划项目(201417)
关键词 深基坑工程 施工过程风险 工作分解结构-风险分解结构(WBS-RBS) 区间数 证据理论 deep excavation engineering construction process risk work breakdown structure-risk breakdown strucutre(WBS-RBS) interval number D-S(Dempster-Shafer) evidence theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1兰守奇,张庆贺.基于模糊理论的深基坑施工期风险评估[J].岩土工程学报,2009,31(4):648-652. 被引量:58
  • 2黄宏伟,边亦海.深基坑工程施工中的风险管理[J].地下空间与工程学报,2005,1(4):611-614. 被引量:123
  • 3Matsuo M,Kawamura K.A design method of deep excavation in cohesive soil base on the reliability theory[J].Soil and Foundations,1980,20(1):61.
  • 4Chen Z Y,Shao C M.Evaluation of minimum factor of safety in slope stability analysis[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2011,25(4):735.
  • 5李朝阳,叶聪,沈圆顺.基于模糊综合评判的地铁基坑施工风险评估[J].地下空间与工程学报,2014,10(1):220-226. 被引量:26
  • 6辛欣,万鹏,沈圆顺.土岩组合地质条件下的基坑工程施工风险评估[J].岩土工程学报,2012,34(S1):342-346. 被引量:16
  • 7Al-Bahar J F,Crandall K C.Systematic risk management approach for construction projects[J].Journal of Construction Engineering&Management,1990,116(3):533.
  • 8Dey P K.Managing project risk using combined analytic hierarchy process and risk map[J].Applied Soft Computing:2010,10(4):990.
  • 9Nieto-Morote A,Ruz-Vila F.A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment[J].International Journal of Project Management:2011,29(2):220.
  • 10Zeng Jiahao,An Min,Smith N J.Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment[J].International Journal of Project Management,2007,25(6):589.

二级参考文献112

共引文献561

同被引文献271

引证文献36

二级引证文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部