期刊文献+

骨组织形态及微观结构的影像学评价及进展 被引量:10

Advancing of imaging evaluation of bone geometry and microarchitecture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 骨组织性质评价是认识以骨质疏松为代表的骨退行性疾病的重要手段。在诸多的评价方法中,影像学评价技术具有自身独特的优势,近年来发展迅速,目前已经逐一实现从大体宏观到纳米微观等不同水平,对骨组织形态、结构进行定性、定量分析。影像学评价技术在骨组织结构表征方面具有非常高的实用价值。本文对该类技术,特别是双能X线检测、定量CT、高分辨p QCT、高分辨核磁成像、显微CT、骨组织成分分析等技术的特征、适用范围以及最新研究进展进行综述,以期为骨组织相关的临床及基础研究提供参考。 Evaluation of bone geometry and microarchitecture is of vital importance for understanding pathological changes of bone degenerative disease,such as osteoporosis. Among various techniques,imaging techniques with their own distinctive advantage have been developing rapidly in recent years. Imaging techniques allow qualitative or quantitative analysis of bone geometry and structure from the macroscale to the nanoscale. This techniques show promising accuracy and practical applicability in bone characterization. This review presents an overview of the relative advantages and disadvantages of the current available imaging methods,such as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry,quantitative CT,highresolution peripheral quantitative CT,high-resolution MRI,micro-CT and methods for tissue composition. The combination of the above noninvasive imaging method can provide a comprehensive evaluation of bone tissue for both clinical and basic researches.
出处 《中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志》 2016年第1期68-74,共7页 Chinese Journal Of Osteoporosis And Bone Mineral Research
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31370947) 解放军医学院博士研究生科研创新资助项目(B13088)
关键词 骨组织 结构评价 影像学技术 bone tissue geometry and structural characterization the imaging techniques
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Anitha D,Lee T.Assessing bone quality in terms of bone mineral density,buckling ratio and critical fracture load[J].J Bone Metab,2014,21:243-247.
  • 2Armas LA,Recker RR.Pathophysiology of osteoporosis:new mechanistic insights[J].Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am,2012,41:475-486.
  • 3Fonseca H,Moreira-Goncalves D,Coriolano HJ,et al.Bone quality:the determinants of bone strength and fragility[J].Sports Med,2014,44:37-53.
  • 4Donnelly E.Methods for assessing bone quality:a review[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2011,469:2128-2138.
  • 5Ellouz R,Chapurlat R,van Rietbergen B,et al.Challenges in longitudinal measurements with HR-p QCT:evaluation of a 3D registration method to improve bone microarchitecture and strength measurement reproducibility[J].Bone,2014,63:147-157.
  • 6Kanis JA,Mc Closkey EV,Johansson H,et al.European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women[J].Osteoporos Int,2013,24:23-57.
  • 7Ahlborg HG,Nguyen ND,Nguyen TV,et al.Contribution of hip strength indices to hip fracture risk in elderly men and women[J].J Bone Miner Res,2005,20:1820-1827.
  • 8Ackerman KE,Pierce L,Guereca G,et al.Hip structural analysis in adolescent and young adult oligoamenorrheic and eumenorrheic athletes and nonathletes[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2013,98:1742-1749.
  • 9Danielson ME,Beck TJ,Karlamangla AS,et al.A comparison of DXA and CT based methods for estimating the strength of the femoral neck in post-menopausal women[J].Osteoporos Int,2013,24:1379-1388.
  • 10Misra M,Katzman DK,Clarke H,et al.Hip structural analysis in adolescent boys with anorexia nervosa and controls[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2013,98:2952-2958.

同被引文献118

引证文献10

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部