摘要
大跨度连续梁桥由于上部结构惯性力较大,导致传统延性抗震设计方法很难满足桥梁抗震性能需求,减隔震技术是解决这一问题的有效途径之一.采用液体粘滞阻尼器配合双曲面球型减隔震支座对某高烈度大跨连续梁桥进行了减隔震设计,结果表明:液体粘滞阻尼器减震效果明显,但固定墩地震力较大仍难以满足要求;采用双曲面球型减隔震支座,除边墩受地震力明显增大外其余墩较均匀的分担了地震荷载,墩身抗震性能充分发挥,且其具备自复位功能震后修复难度较低;液体粘滞阻尼器配合双曲面球型减隔震支座时减震效果明显优于仅设置阻尼器,且前者具备一定的自复位功能,与设置双曲面球型支座相比前者解决了边墩的抗震问题.本桥减隔震设计中此方法最优,该方法可为高烈度区大跨连续梁桥的抗震设计和抗震加固提供参考.
Because the inertial force of the superstructure of the large-span continuous girder bridge is larger,the traditional ductility seismic design method cannot meet the needs of seismic performance of bridge seismic design.The seismic isolation technology is one of the effective ways to solve the problem,so a large-span continuous girder bridge in a high intensity seismic area is taken as an example for seismic isolation design by adopting the fluid viscous damper with double spherical seismic bearing.The results show that the damping effect is obvious after using the damper,but it is still difficult to meet the requirements.In addition,it is hard to repair after the earthquake without the self-resetting function.After using the double spherical seismic bearing,the rest piers are increased to uniformly bear the earthquake load besides the side pier and give full play to the seismic behavior,and they are easy to repair after the earthquake with the self-resetting function.However,when using fluid viscous damper with double spherical seismic bearing,the damping effect is better than the one using the damper and it solves the seismic problems of side piers compared with the double spherical seismic bearing method,for it also has self-resetting function.Based on the above analysis,this method is optimal and can be used as a reference toseismic design and strengthening for similar bridges.
出处
《兰州交通大学学报》
CAS
2016年第1期94-99,共6页
Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University
关键词
大跨度连续梁桥
减隔震设计
液体粘滞阻尼器
双曲面球型减隔震支座
large-span continuous girder bridge
seismic isolation design
fluid viscous damper
double spherical seismic bearing