1AltmannG,“Ambiguity in sentence processing,M Trends inCognitive Sciences’l 998,2:146—152.
2Friederici,et al, “The Role of left inferior frontal andSuperior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizingsyntactic and semantic processes,Cerebral Cortex,2003,13:170 —177.
2Wolverton,G,S.,Zola,D. The temporal characteristics of visual information extraction during reading. In: K. Rayner(ed). Eye movements in reading : Perceptual and language processes. New York: Academic Press, 1983:41-52.
3Jared, Debra., Levy, Betty, Ann., Rayner, K. The role of Phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1999,128:219-264.
4Rayner,K., Morris,Robin,K. Eye movement control in reading: evidence against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1992,18:163-172.
5Weimin, Liu., Inhoff.Albrecht,W. Yun, Ye., Caili, Wu. Use of parafoveaqlly visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human, Perception and performance, 2002,28(5):1213-1227.
6Rayner,K., Engbert,Ralf.kliegl,Ruiuocd. Alexander, Pollatsek. Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 1998,38:1129-1144.
7Enigbert,Ralf.,kliegl,Reiuold. Reinhold, Kliegl Noise-enhanced performance in reading. Neurocomputing, 2003,50,473-478.
8Rayner, K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychology Bulletin, 1998,124(3):372-422.
9Rayner, K, Barbara, Juhasz, Jane, Ashby, Charles, Clifton, Jr. Inhibition of saccade return in reading, Vision Research, 2003,43:1027-1034.
10Binder, Katherine S., Pollatsek, Alexander., Rayner, K. Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and performance, 1999,25:1162-1172.
