期刊文献+

服务组合中保障公平性的信誉传播算法

Fairness-guaranteed reputation propagation in Web service composition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在面向服务的环境中,服务的不透明性、组合结构的复杂性以及用户评价的主观性使得用户难以对组件服务进行有效的信誉评估.针对此问题,提出适用于服务组合的信誉传播算法,将复合服务的信誉评估值公平地传播到各个组件服务.首先,将复合服务建模为Beta混合模型,通过最大期望算法学习复合服务中各个组件的责任及信誉度.其次,基于Shapley值的合作博弈模型计算各个组件服务对复合服务的贡献度,确保所组合的各个服务不会受到额外的奖励或惩罚.最后,理论分析与实验结果表明该算法在保证公平性的前提下,能够正确地将用户提交的信誉评估层次化传播到各个组件服务. In service-oriented environment,it is difficult to evaluate component services because of the opaque characteristic of composite services,the complex invocation structures and the subjective reputation rating of service consumers.To address these issues,this paper proposes a reputation propagation algorithm for service composition,in which the subjective ratings can be fairly propagated to each component service.The algorithm first models service composition as the Beta-mixture,and learns the reputation and responsibility of each component by the EM algorithm.Then,based on the characteristics of Shapley values in cooperative gaming theory,the algorithm computes the contribution of each component to its composition,ensuring that no component would obtain extra rewards or punishments.Finally,theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrate the fairness of the algorithm to hieratically propagate the consumer's rating to each component service.
出处 《西安电子科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期70-76,共7页 Journal of Xidian University
基金 长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助项目(IRT1078) 国家自然科学基金委员会-广东联合基金重点基金资助项目(U1135002) 国家科技部重大专项资助项目(2011ZX03005-002) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61370078)
关键词 面向服务的架构 服务组合 WEB服务 信誉传播 公平性 service-oriented architecture service composition Web services reputation propagation fairness
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1Falcone R,Castelfranchi C.Generalizing Trust:Inferencing Trust Worthiness from Categories[C]//Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence:5396.Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2008:65-80.
  • 2Huynh T D,Jennings N R,Shadbolt N R.An Integrated Trust and Reputation Model for Open Multi-agent Systems[J].Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems,2006,13(2):119-154.
  • 3Kerr R, Cohen R.Smart Cheaters Do Prosper:Defeating Trust and Reputation Systems[C]//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems:2.Budapest:IFAAMAS,2009:798-805.
  • 4Noorian Z,Ulieru M.The State of the Art in Trust and Reputation Systems:a Framework for Comparison[J].Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research,2010,5(2):97-117.
  • 5Jsang A,Quattrociocchi W.Advanced Features in Bayesian Reputation Systems[C]//Lecture Notes in Computer Science:5695.Heidelberg:Springer Verlag,2009:105-114.
  • 6Whitby A,Josang A,Indulska J.Filtering Out Unfair Ratings in Bayesian Reputation Systems[C]//Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies.NewYork:IEEE,2004:48-64.
  • 7Wang Yonghong,Singh M P. Formal Trust Model for Multiagent Systems[C]//Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence. San Francisco:IJCAI,2007:1551-1556.
  • 8Keung S,Griffiths N.Building a Trust-based Social Agent Network[C]//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems:1.Budapest:IFAAMAS,2009:68-79.
  • 9Sen S,Malone N,Chakraborty K.Comprehensive Trust Management[C]//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems:1.Budapest:IFAAMAS,2009:129-146.
  • 10Maximilien E M,Singh M P.Toward Autonomic Web Services Trust and Selection[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Service Oriented Computing.New York:Springer,2004:212-221.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部