期刊文献+

发达国家老年人社会工作服务成效评价标准经验分析 被引量:3

Evaluation Standards on Gerontological Social Work Function in Developed Countries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 发达国家老年人社会工作及服务成效评估发展较早,且积累了较为丰富的经验。本文对发达国家老年人社会工作及服务成效评估的特点和经验进行全面梳理,总结为:以价值理念引领服务及效果评价;质量标准明确;质量标准以立法为基础,并建立了质量标准执行监管机构;职业标准成熟;评价指标相对较为简单,数量也较少;以结果为导向,侧重评价服务的成效而不是过程;普遍应用评估模型。发达国家老年人社会工作服务及成效评价为完善中国老年人社会工作服务提供借鉴。 Developed Countries have a long history in gerontological social work and evaluation. This paper analyzes the characteristics and experiences of developed countries in gerontological social work and evaluation. The characteristics can be summarized as follows: setting clear values and using these values to guide the development of gerontological social work; clear quality standards; legislative foundation for quality standards; mature professional standards; clear and few evaluation index; focusing on outcomes instead of process; using quality evaluation models. These experiences provide reference to the development and evaluation of gerontological social work in China.
作者 陈天红
出处 《标准科学》 2016年第3期84-88,共5页 Standard Science
基金 民政部社会工作招标课题“老年人社会工作服务成效评价指标研究” 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“社会保障精算研究”(项目编号:11JJD840017)中期研究成果
关键词 老年人社会工作 服务成效评价标准 质量标准 质量评估模型 gerontological social work, evaluation standards, quality standards, quality evaluation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1李迎生.西方社会工作发展历程及其对我国的启示[J].学习与实践,2008(7):120-127. 被引量:35
  • 2Schweppenstedde D. etal. RAND Europe. Regulating Quality and Safety of health and Social Care: International Experience, p.10-11, http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_ reports/RR561.html.
  • 3http://socialpolicyframework.alberta.ca.
  • 4http://www.seniors.alberta.ca/documents/Aging-Population-Framework-2010.pdf, p.9.
  • 5爱尔兰健康信息和质量管理局(Health Information andQuality Authority), http://www.hiqa.ie/standards/social/ older-people.
  • 6爱尔兰健康信息和质量管理局(Health Informationand Quality Authority), National Quality Standards for Residential Care Settings for Older People in Ireland, 8,http://www.hiqa.ie/standards/social/older-people.
  • 7Schweppenstedde D. etal. RAND Europe. Regulating Quality and Safety of health and Social Care: International Experience, p.10. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research reports/RR561.html.
  • 8http://www.hhs.gov/programs/index.html.
  • 9Schweppenstedde D. etal. RAND Europe. Regulating Quality and Safety of health and Social Care: International Experience, p.16. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research reports/ RR561.html.
  • 10Blom B., Mor n S. The Evaluation of Quality in Social-Work Practice [J]. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2012(3): 12.

共引文献34

同被引文献25

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部